Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

U.S. Steel Canada plant near Nanticoke, Ontario. The steelworkers union, which represents employees at the company’s mills in Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont., has said it will seek an injunction to stop the shift of production to the U.S.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Salaried employees and retirees of U.S. Steel Canada Inc. want the Ontario Superior Court to order the steel maker's parent to halt any moves to shift steel production out of Canada until after a mediation session.

A plan by United States Steel Corp. to shift production of high value-added steel from Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont., to U.S. mills has brought a year-long battle between the Pittsburgh-based giant and its stakeholders to a head.

After the United Steelworkers union became aware the company was planning to move production of about 180,000 tons of steel, it sought an injunction to halt the transfer.

Story continues below advertisement

U.S. Steel Canada has responded with threats to cease production entirely by the end of the year unless it is able to cut off health-care benefits for more than 20,000 retirees and dependents and halt all municipal tax payments.

The salaried employees and retirees argue the company should be prevented from taking any action on production until a hearing is held on the union's application for an injunction. That hearing is set for later this month after three scheduled days of mediation.

U.S. Steel Canada has been operating under the court protection of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act since September, 2014.

But its parent company "did not obtain the approval of this court for the USS plant loading [production transfer] nor did USS bring any motion before this court for approval of the USS plant loading," the salaried employees and retirees said in a notice of motion submitted to Justice Herman Wilton-Siegel, who is overseeing the case.

"Despite numerous requests, USS has refused to stand still with the U.S. plant loading and continues to proceed with the U.S. plant loading," the notice of motion said.

A standstill order is required because the production shift damages U.S. Steel Canada financially and impairs the environment for the mediation sessions, lawyers for the salaried employees and retirees said in a separate court filing.

U.S. Steel has refused to stand still despite requests during case conferences with the judge that it do so, Gary Dallin, a member of the salaried employee and

Story continues below advertisement

retiree group said in an affidavit.

Switching orders between Canadian and U.S. plants can be done easily, so any argument that actions need to be taken now makes no sense, Mr. Dalling said.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies