Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Workers walk near the No.4 reactor of the Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO)’s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Fukushima prefecture, in this photo released by Kyodo, March 1, 2013, ahead of the second-year anniversary of the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami. French energy group Areva said it was preparing to send nuclear fuel to Japan for the first time since the Fukushima disaster, a sign of possible restarts of idled Japanese reactors.

KYODO/Reuters

French energy group Areva said it was preparing to send nuclear fuel to Japan for the first time since the Fukushima disaster of March, 2011, a sign of possible restarts of idled Japanese reactors.

The shipment of mixed oxide fuel (MOX) is likely to be controversial in Japan, where public opposition to nuclear power and reactor restarts remains strong in the run-up to the second anniversary of the March 11, 2011 catastrophe.

The fuel will be shipped out of the port of Cherbourg in northern France in early April, according to Greenpeace, an anti-nuclear group. Areva officials declined to comment on the timing.

Story continues below advertisement

France's state-owned nuclear group, whose activities range from uranium mining and enrichment to reactors and waste recycling, said it was in talks with Japanese authorities to prepare a shipment, which had been delayed since the Fukushima meltdowns.

"We believe there could be half a dozen reactors which will restart at the end of 2013 (in Japan)," Areva chief executive officer Luc Oursel told a news briefing on Monday.

The long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan has returned to power and has said it will reassess the previous government's decision to abandon atomic power after Fukushima, the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986.

A 2011 MOX shipment was destined for Kansai Electric Power Co's Takahama nuclear plant west of Tokyo, Chubu Electric's Hamaoka and Tokyo Electric Power's Fukushima on the eastern coast, according to Greenpeace.

"We suspect that part of the shipment is destined to the same recipients," Yannick Rousselet, a Greenpeace official, said.

A spokesman at Kansai Electric said the company had no plans for any MOX fuel shipments at this time but confirmed it had been the intended recipient of the 2011 shipment from France.

Kansai Electric uses MOX fuel in the No. 3 unit at Takahama and has plans in place to start using the fuel in the No. 4 reactor there.

Story continues below advertisement

Chubu Electric spokesman Akio Miyazaki denied that the utility will be the recipient of the shipment. Chubu's sole nuclear plant is closed for upgrades to its tsunami defences.

A Tokyo Electric spokesman said the company had no MOX fuel shipment plan in 2011 and no plans to accept the fuel at this time.

Because MOX fuel contains around 7-per-cent plutonium, it is perceived as a national security threat, and special precautions are taken during transportation.

The Fukushima crisis prompted the gradual shutdown of all of Japan's 50 nuclear reactors until there were none left operating in May, 2012, leaving the country without atomic power for the first time since 1970.

Now two reactors at Kansai Electric's Ohi plant near Takahama are the only ones operating in Japan so far, and the country has had to resort to imports of fossil fuel to run power stations, pushing it into a record trade deficit.

The decision last June by the previous Democratic Party of Japan government to restart the two reactors weeks after the last full shutdown galvanized the previously dormant anti-nuclear movement, sparking the biggest demonstrations in decades and contributing to the party's downfall in elections in December.

Story continues below advertisement

Media surveys have shown a majority of Japanese want to abandon atomic energy by 2030, if not sooner, which makes it a risky proposition for the new government to restart even the reactors deemed safe.

Utilities and the government, however, are keen to reduce expensive oil and gas imports. Major manufacturers have also called on the government to restart idled nuclear plants.

(Additional reporting by James Topham in Tokyo)

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies