Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

A Nexen oil sands facility seen from a helicopter near Fort McMurray, Alta., Tuesday, July 10, 2012.

Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press

China's official media cheered Ottawa's decision to allow the takeover of Nexen Inc. by a Chinese government-owned oil company as symbolic, expressing hope that it would lead other countries to end their "bias" against large Chinese investments.

However, a key adviser to the Chinese government acknowledged that Beijing would have to accept and adapt to the new reality that no more takeovers by foreign state-owned enterprises would be allowed in Canada's oil sands.

In an editorial distributed to media outlets around the country, the Xinhua news wire said the successful $15.1-billion acquisition of Calgary-based Nexen by China National Offshore Oil Corporation (better known as CNOOC) – approved Friday by the Conservative government – represented an important breakthrough for Chinese firms that have often been treated with suspicion when they try to enter foreign markets.

Story continues below advertisement

"The [CNOOC-Nexen] deal attracted widespread attention, so its approval has symbolic significance," Xinhua wrote Saturday. "It turns out to be a model for Chinese enterprises 'going out' [into foreign markets] and sets an important precedent for future foreign acquisitions by Chinese enterprises. For some time, the internationalization of Chinese enterprises was not going well, with the overseas mergers and acquisitions setbacks for [communications giants] Huawei and ZTE, so this appears to be a breakthrough."

The editorial was apparently referring to a recent U.S. congressional report that found Huawei and ZTE to be national security threats because of their links to the Chinese government. In 2011, Huawei dropped a takeover bid for U.S. server technology firm 3Leaf Systems after a U.S. government panel ruled it should not be allowed to go ahead.

Some in Canada had portrayed CNOOC – which was founded in 1982 by China's State Council, or cabinet – in the same light, worrying that the apparent willingness to overpay for Nexen (the $15.1-billion offer represented a 61 per cent premium on Nexen's pre-bid market value) suggested CNOOC had motives other than profit in purchasing a foothold in the Alberta oil sands. In 2005, CNOOC ended an $18.5-billion bid for Unocal in the face of political opposition in the U.S.

A separate, stronger Xinhua editorial issued Sunday said that "Western powers" – a clear reference to the U.S. – needed to "drop their bias" against Chinese firms in the wake of the CNOOC-Nexen deal. "For quite a while, Chinese investors have been discredited by some Western governments and media as a group of cash-rich predators and spies. They have been wrongly reported to forage across the world for energy resources and raw materials on behalf of the Chinese government and covertly plot to sabotage the national security of those who receive their investments."

The editorial noted that the CNOOC-Nexen deal provoked "strong domestic protests" in Canada, and was approved only after Ottawa twice extended its own deadline for passing judgment on it. "Friday's hard-earned approval for the largest overseas takeover by a China-based company has expressly revealed the predicament that has frustrated Chinese entrepreneurs' enthusiasm for foreign investments and prompted them to question the fairness of foreign marketplaces."

The unexpected caveat Prime Minister Stephen Harper added on Friday – that the Nexen takeover and a $5.2-billion purchase of Calgary's Progress Energy Resources Corp. by Malaysia's state-owned Petronas (which was approved at the same time) would be the last takeovers by foreign state-owned firms allowed in Canada's oil sands – got scarce mention and no commentary in China's state media.

However, Xu Xiaojie, head of the international energy program at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a think-tank that advises the government, said Beijing would have little choice but to accept the new rules. He said they wouldn't diminish Chinese investors' interest in the oil sands.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is reasonable for the Canadian government and Canadian society. This is the first and maybe the last [approval] because of the size," Mr. Xu said in a telephone interview. "In the future maybe there will be no similar deals, but other types of cooperation can be concluded. A long line of Chinese investors remains keenly interested in Canada."

Mr. Harper's signal that takeovers by companies controlled by foreign governments would no longer be welcome "is a brand new thing for the Chinese government and decision-makers. They have to think of this as a new challenge and a new reality," Mr. Xu added.

In a statement posted on the CNOOC website, chief executive officer Li Fanrong said the company was "delighted that the Minister of Industry has concluded that this transaction represents a 'net benefit' to Canada."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies