Skip to main content

Avon Products Inc. said it would cut 600 jobs, after reporting a net loss of $168-million (U.S.) in the first quarter, dragged down by plunging sales in North America.

Elise Amendola/The Canadian Press

Beauty has met the beast.

This week alone, two of the world's major beauty products companies have slashed jobs and announced restructuring plans, just the latest fallout from an overcrowded, sluggish cosmetics market, particularly in North America.

On Tuesday, Elizabeth Arden Inc. announced plans to discontinue some products, eliminate jobs, and close a unit in Puerto Rico. The day before, Avon Products Inc. said it would cut 600 jobs, after reporting a net loss of $168-million (U.S.) in the first quarter, dragged down by plunging sales in North America.

Story continues below advertisement

Globally, the cosmetics industry is forecast to grow by 3.5 to 4 per cent in 2014, on par with previous years, according to L'Oréal CEO Jean-Paul Agon. But in North America the picture is drearier: U.S. growth is expected to flatline as demand lags behind that of Europe and emerging markets.

Big brands are struggling to compete in what has become a very mature North American market, plagued by slow population growth. Huge product lines and a multitude of brands are crowding the aisles of Shoppers Drug Mart and Wal-Mart, squeezing the profits of multinational beauty giants.

"You can really only do so much in driving sales," said Svetlana Uduslivaia, senior research analyst at Euromonitor International. "People only need so much shampoo and mascara."

As shoppers face a deluge of product offerings, building brand loyalty becomes an even greater challenge for companies. Major retailers, such as Shoppers Drug Mart, are becoming more selective in which brands they list and sometimes downsizing the number of brands featured based on sales thresholds, said Ms. Uduslivaia.

Investors have caught on: Avon Inc.'s shares have plummeted by 30 per cent from a year ago, and earnings have disappointed in five of the last eight quarters. Elizabeth Arden has fared even worse, with shares down 42 per cent from a year ago. Even Proctor & Gamble, whose revenues have consistently beat expectations, has seen its stock price barely budge, up 2 per cent since last year.

The 2008 financial crisis was a blight on all retailers. Six years later, consumer confidence has recovered somewhat. But postrecessionary tactics, such as promotional pricing, are still in place, further pressuring profits.

In Canada, total beauty and personal care sales grew by a tepid 3 per cent to $9-billion (Canadian) in 2013, according to Euromonitor. With the Canadian and U.S. market oversaturated with beauty companies, big players have shifted their eyes toward emerging markets to tap new shoppers. China's cosmetics industry grew a healthy 13 per cent in 2013, and has more than doubled in size between 2008 and 2012, according to the National Bureau of Statistics of China.

Story continues below advertisement

Large multinational players have already enjoyed impressive success in China's cosmetics sector: Procter & Gamble takes up 15 per cent of the market, followed by L'Oréal with 11 per cent, according to a report from the Fung Group.

But navigating China's fiercely competitive mass market has proven tricky, prompting a few major brands to step away recently. Revlon Inc. pulled out of China in January, and a week later, L'Oréal scrapped its Garnier product line there. In its financial statement from October last year, L'Oréal noted that its Chinese market was "slowing, although still dynamic."

"Both [L'Oréal and Revlon's exits] were driven by lack of scale and reflect a more challenging Chinese mass market," said Bloomberg Industries luxury analyst Deborah Aitken.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter