Skip to main content

Pork producers in Canada and other leading countries are threatening to pull their support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal unless tariffs go to zero on “virtually all” agriculture products.

John Morstad/The Globe and Mail

Pork producers in Canada and other leading countries are threatening to pull their support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal unless tariffs go to zero on "virtually all" agriculture products.

In an open letter, the pork producers said Japan's continued refusal to open vast sectors of its protected farm market – including pork and beef – is threatening to derail the talks.

Japan's protectionist stance is causing other countries to balk at making concessions of their own, warned the groups, which include the Canadian Pork Council and associations representing U.S., Australian, Chilean and Mexican pork producers.

Story continues below advertisement

"A broad exemption for Japan will encourage other TPP countries to withhold market access concessions, backtrack on current offers, lower the ambition on rules language and possibly unravel the entire agreement," according to the two-page letter. "It would set a dangerous precedent."

The letter does not specifically mention Canada's protected dairy and poultry sectors, which Ottawa has so far staunchly defended in the TPP negotiations.

But Martin Rice, executive director the Canadian Pork Council, agreed that Japan's intransigence in pivotal negotiations with the U.S. is providing cover for Canada and other countries.

"The talks aren't even going to the point where countries can make those kinds of choices because they aren't seeing what's on the table," Mr. Rice said.

"Everybody, not just Canada, is waiting to see what emerges out of the U.S.-Japan discussions. I don't blame Canada for not putting stuff on the table that is sensitive."

Mr. Rice said the TPP was supposed to be the "gold standard" for free-trade agreements, with zero tariffs on virtually everything. Instead, Japan is refusing to open its pork and beef markets – potential deal-breakers for Canada.

"That's what we understood TPP was all about – that everything would be on the table," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

TPP negotiators are meeting this week in Hanoi as they aim to reach a final deal by the end of the year. But momentum has stalled because of the slow progress of parallel negotiations between the U.S. and Japan, the newest TPP member.

Last month, a powerful group of U.S. senators, including the leaders of the trade subcommittee of the powerful House ways and means committee, urged the Obama administration to boot both Canada and Japan out of the TPP talks unless they open up their protected agricultural sectors.

The demands echo frustrations expressed publicly by top U.S. government officials, who have complained in recent months about Canada's refusal to put the supply management system on the table in the TPP talks.

The system, which shields domestic dairy, poultry and egg producers from most foreign competition, is becoming a more frequent target of other agricultural exporting powers, including the U.S., Australia, New Zealand and Europe.

Toronto trade lawyer Lawrence Herman said he expects Japan to eventually crack under intense pressure from the U.S. and other TPP countries. And he said attention will then quickly shift to Canada and other countries that have so-called "sensitive" sectors.

"If Japan makes market-opening concessions, it will mean the guns will then be trained on Canada to put access to our supply managed sectors, particularly dairy, on the table. That would be a good thing," Mr. Herman said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter