Skip to main content

Jane Austen expert Hazel Jones reads from Austen's novel "Pride and Prejudice" during a twelve hour live readathon at the Jane Austen Center in Bath, southern England January 28, 2013. Former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney faces the issue of whether Austen should replace Charles Darwin on Britain’s 10 pound note.

SUZANNE PLUNKETT/REUTERS

Mervyn King, the outgoing Governor of the Bank of England, handed his successor, Mark Carney, a tricky decision on Tuesday; whether to replace Charles Darwin with Jane Austen on Britain's £10 notes.

There has been a growing controversy in Britain over who appears on banknotes ever since Sir Mervyn announced in April that Winston Churchill will replace 19-century prison reformer Elizabeth Fry on Britain's £5 note in 2016. That decision meant no women will be featured on British notes, other than the Queen.

Portraits on the other bills include Mr. Darwin on the £10, Adam Smith the £20, steam engine inventors Matthew Boulton and James Watt on a new £50; and the Bank's first Governor John Houblon who is on an older version of the £50 note released in 1994 to celebrate the Bank's 300th anniversary.

Story continues below advertisement

More than 28,000 people have signed an online petition against the decision to drop Ms. Fry and university student Caroline Criado-Perez has launched a legal challenge under Britain's Equality Law. That legislation requires government agencies to take equality issues into account when shaping policy and carrying out their duties.

On Tuesday, Sir Mervyn offered his first comment on the controversy during a parliamentary committee hearing. He told Members of Parliament that there was no intention of dropping women from Britain's notes and that the bank always develops a backup note, in case there are technical problems with the first pick.

"That second figure often becomes the figure on the following note," Sir Mervyn told the committee "The [back up] figure that we have been working with for two years, we've said already it's a woman. I can tell you today it's Jane Austen. The Jane Austen note has been up and running internally for two years. That clearly is a candidate for the 10 pound note down the road to replace [Darwin]."

Sir Mervyn said that it will be up to Mr. Carney, who becomes Governor on July 1, to decide whether Ms. Austen -- author of Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility and Persuasion – takes the spot from Mr. Darwin. He added that £5 notes with Ms. Fry will remain in circulation even when the new notes with Sir Winston appear.

"Let me assure you that there is no imminent demise of Elizabeth Fry on the banknotes and I think it is extremely unlikely that we should ever find ourselves in the position where there are no women among the historical figures on our banknotes. Jane Austen is quietly waiting in the wings," he said.

Ms. Criado-Perez, a student at the London School of Economics, said she remained wary. "My reaction to that is that I'm not going to be placated by vague assurances; I want the bank to commit to an open and transparent decision-making process that has equality at its heart - nothing less than that is going to satisfy me," she said Tuesday.

She added that Sir Mervyn actually made a mistake during the hearing, suggesting that Ms. Austen would replace Charles Dickens on the £10 note. Mr. Dickens is not on any note. "So that's pretty hilarious," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

"My main goal is that we don't ever end up with an all-male line up and also that future decisions are guaranteed to be taken in a transparent way and under the auspices of the Equality Act," she added.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter