Skip to main content
//empty //empty

Onlookers watch share prices on a screen on the facade of the Bombay Stock Exchange, BSE, in Mumbai, India, Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2008.

Gautam Singh/AP/Gautam Singh/AP

India's trade deficit widened in May on higher imports of crude mirroring rising global crude prices, prompting Trade Secretary Rahul Khullar to warn that the trade deficit for the current fiscal could touch the high $145- $150-billion (U.S.) mark.

India's trade deficit rose 67 per cent in May from a month ago, despite a 57 per cent increase in exports in May, on the back of strong performance in engineering, petroleum products and electronics driving growth.

However, a surge in imports, especially driven by gold and oil, have again widened the trade deficit, which may in turn pressure the current account deficit.

Story continues below advertisement

"The big change between the last couple of months and now is that imports have suddenly surged," Mr. Khullar said.

India's oil imports are expected to increase by 18 per cent in May. Global crude prices hit the $120 per barrel mark on Friday.

The December quarter current account gap stood at $9.7-billion versus $12.2-billion year ago. Mr. Khullar had said earlier that he expects the FY 11 current account deficit to be in the range of 2.5 to 2.8 per cent.

Investment banker Goldman Sachs had earlier flagged off India's high current account deficit as a risk to the economy and raised the red flag on it being financed mostly by short term flows.

India's exports in May rose an annual 56.9 per cent to $25.9-billion, while imports for the month rose 54.1 per cent to $40.9-billion, Mr. Khullar said on Friday, citing provisional data.

India's trade deficit in May stood at $15-billion.

There are question marks on the sustainability of the strong export figures as most economic indicators indicate a slowdown. Growth in industrial output for April has slowed down and the economy grew at the slowest in five quarters during the March quarter.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies