Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff speaks during breakfast with reporters at the Planalto Palace in Brasilia Dec. 27, 2012. (UESLEI MARCELINO/REUTERS)
Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff speaks during breakfast with reporters at the Planalto Palace in Brasilia Dec. 27, 2012. (UESLEI MARCELINO/REUTERS)


Rousseff makes controversial bet on Brazil’s economic future Add to ...

Ms. Rousseff has let other long-sacred fiscal principles slip as well. Members of her economic team have said that in 2012 Brazil likely missed a key budget target, known as the primary surplus, which is a way to measure fiscal prudence. Making the 2013 target is in doubt, as well.

Despite some concerns, it seems likely Ms. Rousseff will get the greater budget flexibility she craves, with minimal protest from legislators or financial markets.

While not beloved by investors, Ms. Rousseff is seen as a sober economic steward who has limited government spending when necessary during her two years in office.

More importantly, she can argue that Brazil now has a clear track record of managing its accounts – public debt has fallen from nearly 60 per cent of gross domestic product a decade ago to just 35 per cent today, a low level that just about any rich country would love to have – although some rating agencies say it underestimates Brazil’s liabilities.

Ms. Rousseff is also sure to have support from Brazil’s business lobby, which believes an across-the-board tax cut is the best way to revive an economy that grew just 1 per cent in 2012.

Still, long-time Brazil observers worry about precedent, aware there are still profligate forces lurking in Brasilia.

“I don’t think (the proposed change) is a disaster,” said Alberto Ramos, Latin America economist at Goldman Sachs. “But by opening the door, you could eventually use those exceptions to do other things that are not warranted.”

‘Culture of high rates’

The far riskier bet is the one that Ms. Rousseff is making on inflation and interest rates. If it goes bad, it could potentially sink her presidency.

The benchmark Selic interest rate has for years been way above rich nations and other Latin American countries – another legacy of Brazil’s turbulent years. The Selic hit 25 per cent as recently as 2003, and was at 12.5 per cent in August 2011.

That was when Brazil’s central bank, led by its chief Alexandre Tombini but with clear input from Ms. Rousseff, set in motion an aggressive and unexpected rate-cutting cycle that pushed the Selic to its current record low of 7.25 per cent.

Economists generally agree the rate cuts now look prescient, as Brazil’s economic struggles and the euro zone crisis have kept a lid on inflation at home and abroad.

The potential problem: Ms. Rousseff wants rates to stay as low as possible throughout 2013, preferably at their current level.

Many investors warn that’s a recipe for trouble. Inflation has already crept up to 5.78 per cent in the past 12 months – near the top of the central bank’s target range, despite the moribund economy.

Meanwhile, economic activity is expected to kick into a higher gear at the beginning of this year, pressuring demand even more. A coming hike in gasoline prices will further complicate matters.

Some officials privately admit the approach carries risks, but say only bold government action can bring the financial system into line with other economies.

“We have to end this culture of high rates in Brazil,” a senior official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “There’s no logical reason for them to still be so high … The market won’t (bring rates down) if we don’t oblige it to.”

The central bank has said it will raise rates if necessary. But Ms. Rousseff has made the record-low Selic one of her government’s calling cards, and touted the achievement in her end-of-year address on Dec. 23.

She has also publicly lobbied banks to translate the lower Selic into a bigger decline in interest rates for consumers, saying she “won’t rest” until they do.

And while investors have been spoiled with double-digit returns on investments in government projects, a coming wave of infrastructure programs such as railroads will only offer returns comparable to Brazil’s current lower rates, according to officials.

An enduring shift in interest rates would give Ms. Rousseff the defining achievement of her presidency and bring enormous benefits for Brazil’s economy – reducing business costs and making financing for construction, mortgages and other long-term investments more widely available.

But if Ms. Rousseff moves too fast and prices spike while growth stays flat, she will endure a third straight year of disappointing economic performance.

That would make her vulnerable to a challenge in the 2014 election from opposition leader Aecio Neves or another candidate. Voters are extremely sensitive to inflation when evaluating their leaders – another legacy of the 1990s.

Will it work out? Has Brazil left its past behind?

Gray Newman, Latin America economist for Morgan Stanley, said Ms. Rousseff’s saving grace ironically may be another down year for the global economy which helps keep prices subdued.

“Her strategy may well work in 2013,” Mr. Newman said. “But that won’t necessarily mean it’s a new era for Brazil.”

Report Typo/Error
Single page

Next story




Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular