Skip to main content

The logo of MGM Grand Macau hotel resort is displayed outside its hotel in Macau, in this February 15, 2011 file picture. Macau casino operator MGM China raised $1.5 billion from its Hong Kong initial public offering after pricing it at the top of its indicative range, triggering some concerns about lofty valuations. The IPO of MGM China will make it the latest U.S. casino affiliate to go public in Hong Kong and make Pansy Ho, daughter of Macau's legendary casino magnate, worth $5 billion on paper.

TYRONE SIU/REUTERS

Macau casino operator MGM China raised $1.5-billion (U.S.) from its Hong Kong initial public offering after pricing it at the top of its indicative range, triggering some concerns about lofty valuations.

The firm, co-owned by MGM Resorts International and casino mogul Stanley Ho's daughter Pansy Ho, is the last to be listed out of six casino companies operating in Macau.

Gambling revenues in the world's largest gaming market are at record highs, dwarfing those of Las Vegas and fuelling a surge in share prices of local casino operators that boosted demand for MGM China's IPO.

Story continues below advertisement

The rally may have pushed stock prices in the sector too far, reducing their appeal to some investors, Mark To, a Wing Fung Financial Group analyst, said on Friday.

"I won't buy into the IPO, not right now. The Macau casino business has been red hot for a while now, so its valuation is actually not cheap, making it not very competitive."

The Thomson Reuters Hong Kong Casinos & Gaming index is up more than 41 per cent so far this year in a flat broader market.

In a statement to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, MGM China said it sold 760 million shares at HK$15.34 a share, raising HK$11.66-billion ($1.5-billion U.S.) after setting an indicative range of HK$12.36 to HK$15.34 a share.

Macau's biggest casino operator, Stanley Ho's SJM Holdings, has nearly three times the revenue of MGM China, while No. 2 company Sands China, the unit of billionaire Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp., is nearly double that of MGM China.

SJM's stock surged nearly 52 per cent so far this year, compared with a 23 per cent gain for Sands China.

January-April gaming revenue in the former Portuguese colony, the only place in China where casino gambling is legal, totalled $10-billion, matching Las Vegas's total for the whole of 2010.

Story continues below advertisement

The IPO will catapult Ms. Ho near the top of Asia's billionaire list, surpassing her father with an estimated wealth of nearly $5-billion, taking into consideration her stake in MGM China and other holdings.

The elder Mr. Ho, known as Macau's casino King because of his longstanding monopoly that ended in 2002, has a fortune estimated at about $3-billion.

MGM China's IPO was backed by cornerstone investors including hedge fund manager John Paulson, who jointly bought $190-million worth of shares.

"The sector is still a darling with investors. It's growing very strongly and there is no sign of deceleration," said Teng Yee Tan, a gaming analyst at CIMB Research in Hong Kong.

Macau's gaming market is forecast to double in size to $50-billion between 2013 and 2015, according to Goldman Sachs estimates.

The number of visitors to Macau are expected to jump nearly 54 percent by 2015 from 2010 to 38.4 million people, while the number of hotel rooms is seen up 41 percent over the same period, Goldman said in a May 6 report.

Story continues below advertisement

Bank of America Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Morgan Stanley will act as joint global coordinators for the offering.

($1 U.S. = 7.783 Hong Kong Dollars)

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter