Skip to main content

Shoppers use a Fifth Avenue entrance to Saks, in New York, in this file photo.

Richard Drew/The Associated Press

A U.S. regulatory filing says Saks Inc. has agreed in principle to settle suits filed by some of its shareholders, who objected to the U.S. retailer's US$2.9-billion friendly takeover by Hudson's Bay Co. (TSX:HBC).

Saks has agreed to make additional disclosures before its shareholders vote on the deal and HBC has agreed to accept less time for matching a rival offer and a smaller termination fee if the original deal doesn't close as expected by year's end.

The filing says the settlement won't affect the amount that HBC will pay to acquire Saks, one of the world's leading luxury brands.

Story continues below advertisement

HBC announced the deal in July, saying it planned to open up to seven full-line Saks stores in Canada as well as two dozen locations under its Saks Off Fifth discount stores.

The lawsuits alleged, in general, that Saks had reached an agreement that made it too difficult for rivals to mount a counter offer against HBC.

Under the proposed settlement, Hudson's Bay has agreed to a US$5-million reduction in the termination fee it could receive if Saks doesn't close the deal. The fee was originally $73.5-million and will be reduced to $68.5-million.

HBC will also get less time – three business days instead of four – to "match" a rival offer. Saks will also get an additional 24 hours, bringing the total to 72 hours, before it must alert HBC that it has received a confidential rival offer.

The U.S. filing says a memorandum of understanding signed by the parties will seek to withdraw the litigation, subject to court and other approvals.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies