Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

It's distressing enough that young Canadians are falling further behind their parents and grandparents, in income and opportunity.

But governments may be worsening the generational divide by directing the bulk of their limited resources at the people who need it least – seniors.

The latest example is Ontario's plan for an enhanced Canada Pension Plan, set to take effect in 2017.

Story continues below advertisement

Intergenerational inequality might be tolerable when the population of working Canadians vastly outnumbers retirees.

But that's not where we are headed. The generation of worker bees is in the midst of a long and unstoppable decline. By 2030, when the youngest of the Baby Boomers reaches retirement age, nearly one in four Canadians will be 65 or older, up from roughly 15 per cent now, according to projections by Statistics Canada. And the working-age population – those aged 15 to 64 – will fall to 60 per cent of the total and stay there, down from near 70 per cent today.

The result is that we are leaning on already financially stressed workers to pay for more of everything we expect from government, including Medicare, Old Age Security, education and a vast array of social services.

"Canadians are a personal responsibility people," pointed out Paul Kershaw, a professor at the University of British Columbia's School of Population and Public Health. "We want to pay for what we use. We don't want to leave our bills for our kids and grandchildren," Prof. Kershaw said.

And yet we are short-changing younger workers, according to Prof. Kershaw, who has just released new research on the "age gap" in social spending. Ottawa and the provinces now spend between $33,321 and $40,152 annually for everyone age 65-plus – the majority of which is paid out of general revenues. That's roughly three times what governments spend on 45- to 64-year-olds, and nearly four times the resources dedicated to those under 45.

Some of that inequity is entirely rational. Older Canadians consume more health care and deserve income support in retirement.

Canada spends generously compared to its wealthy OECD peers on health and education, but it's near the bottom on family-centric policies, such as paid parental leave and daycare.

Story continues below advertisement

Ontario's proposed Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP) – a mandatory forced savings plan for people without workplace pensions – is another example of inadvertent age discrimination, according to Prof. Kershaw. Younger workers, he said, are "already squeezed for money" because they earn less, and they are paying far more than previous generations for housing, education and child care.

"Where the hell are the young people going to find that money?" Prof. Kershaw wondered.

Josh Hjartarson, vice-president policy and government policy at the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, agreed that too much public policy is being directed at seniors.

"This is a blanket approach to a very narrow problem," Mr. Hjartarson said.

A relatively small percentage of Canadians aren't currently saving enough for retirement – mainly middle and high-income earners who don't have defined benefit workplace pensions, according to a brief prepared by the chamber for submission to Ontario's Ministry of Finance. Citing a recent study by McKinsey & Co., the chamber pointed out that 83 per cent of Canadian households are on track to be able to spend at least as much as they are now when they retire.

The chamber worries the pension scheme will "penalize" businesses.

Story continues below advertisement

Just as relevant is the burden it will place on a workforce that is already falling further behind financially. The income gap between older and younger workers has expanded massively since the 1980s, leaving today's twentysomethings the first generation to be worse off than their parents.

Based on an analysis of nearly three decades of income tax data, a recent Conference Board of Canada study found that the average disposable income of 50- to 54-year-olds is 64 per cent higher than 25- to 29-year-olds, up from a gap of 47 per cent in the mid-1980s.

And while younger workers are earning relatively less than their parents did, they are facing a host of costs that are vastly higher. High house prices are a boon for retirees, but they can be an anchor or a barrier to entry for younger workers.

Governments would get the biggest bang for their buck by shifting some of the focus to the needs of younger workers, through enhanced paid leave and investments in daycare, Prof. Kershaw argued.

The goal is laudable: Treat the next generation as a precious and increasingly rare resource.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies