Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Former executives are among a group of non-union Labatt retirees who launched a class-action bid yesterday, claiming the beer maker and its Brazilian parent broke a promise to provide them with almost unlimited health benefits.

In a statement of claim filed in the Ontario Superior Court, the plaintiffs accuse Labatt of breach of contract, conspiracy and unjust enrichment by capping benefits for retirees.

"This unilateral change constituted a breach of each (employee's) contract and violates his or her vested retirement rights and health protection benefits and those of their eligible dependants," the claim states.

Story continues below advertisement

Saying the company's actions were "arbitrary, callous and high-handed," the suit also seeks $50,000 in punitive damages for each member of the proposed lawsuit class, estimated at 900 retirees who were salaried and non-unionized, and 700 dependants.

One retiree is Bob Smith, who was director of information technology when he left Labatt after 25 years in 2005 and then retired.

Mr. Smith, 57, a married father of two, received a kidney from his son in early 2006 and worries his benefits will be exhausted within five years because he needs expensive anti-rejection drugs.

There was no immediate response from Labatt.

None of the claims, which also name the company's parent, AmBev of Brazil, has been proven in court.

In a letter last December to retirees, obtained by Canadian Press, Labatt announced the change to their benefits effective March 1, 2007.

Key among the changes was a cap on cumulative lifetime health and drug benefits at $50,000.

Story continues below advertisement

The letter said Labatt's premium costs for retirees had risen 44 per cent between 2002 and 2006, and, as a result, the company had "no choice" but to impose the limits.

"Our top priority is to provide benefits that give fair and optimal coverage for everyone, while at the same time managing our costs in the future," said the letter written by Marcio Froes Torres, vice-president at InBev, which controls AmBev.

"Continued premium increases of this magnitude are clearly not conducive to a sustainable business."

The letter also claims few retirees would ever exceed the limits, based on past experience.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies