Skip to main content

Mining organizations say the new rules would allow citizens to hold governments to account for the resource revenues they collect.

Canada's mining industry has endorsed a plan that would require mandatory reporting to provincial securities commissions of all project-related payments they make to governments, a move that global transparency groups are hailing as groundbreaking.

In a final report to be issued Thursday, the country's two largest mining organizations joined with transparency advocates to urge governments to move quickly to implement the plan, which they said would allow citizens in mineral-rich countries to hold governments to account for the resource revenues they collect.

The Mining Association of Canada and the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada have launched a lobbying effort to persuade the Ontario Securities Commission and other provincial bodies to adopt the new rules.

Story continues below advertisement

Prime Minister Stephen Harper endorsed the idea of mandatory reporting for all resource companies at last year's Group of Eight summit, and Natural Resources Canada is now consulting with provinces and industry on how to implement the policy for both mining and oil companies.

"This is a real game-changer globally," said Claire Woodside, director at Publish What You Pay Canada, which worked with industry to finalize the plan. "It's the first time an industry group has come out in support of mandatory transparency … so this is a real important moment for global momentum."

Canada is a major force in international mining, with companies such as Barrick Gold Corp., Goldcorp Inc. and Teck Resources Ltd. operating around the world. Some 60 per cent of the world's mining companies – operating in more than 100 countries – are listed on Canadian stock exchanges and subject to provincial securities regulations.

The new rules would require large mining companies to report, on a project-by-project basis, all payments above $100,000 and set the threshold for junior firms at $10,000.

"The framework is consistent with existing laws in the European Union and the United States, and moves us a big step closer to a global standard," said Pierre Gratton, chief executive at the Mining Association. "A global standard is critical for this type of disclosure to create a level playing field for companies."

Mr. Gratton said the regulators are now catching up to the industry and the federal government on the issue. "There was a little bit of a surprise that the industry was asking for more regulation," he said with a laugh. "But there are business reasons for doing this, and sometimes additional regulations is actually good for business."

However, the transparency movement suffered a setback in the United States last year when a court upheld an oil industry challenge and forced the Securities and Exchange Commission to reconsider its rules, or at least offer a better justification.

Story continues below advertisement

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers says it supports the principle of the mandatory publish-what-you-pay rules, but worries about the implementation.

CAPP vice-president Bob Bleaney said the industry wants not just publicly-traded firms but privately-owned and state-owned companies to be covered. He said CAPP would support reporting on a project-by-project approach, so long as there is some flexibility on the definition of what constitutes a project.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter