Skip to main content

Bank executives are now speaking with much more confidence about the likelihood that any correction, should one materialize, is likely to be a soft landing.

FRED LUM/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

Finance Minister Joe Oliver says that he is monitoring the housing market closely, as Bank of Montreal chose to aggressively cut its five-year mortgage rate to levels that caused Mr. Oliver's predecessor, Jim Flaherty, to intervene last year.

"Our Government has taken action in the past to reduce consumer indebtedness and the Government's exposure to the housing market," Mr. Oliver said in an e-mailed statement. "I will continue to monitor the market closely."

Just one week after Mr. Flaherty stepped down, BMO said it will now be offering five-year fixed mortgages at 2.99 per cent, slashing its rate from 3.49 per cent. While that's not the lowest rate in the market, BMO is the first big bank to move below the sensitive 3-per-cent threshold.

Story continues below advertisement

The last time a Canadian bank's mortgage rates fell this low, in March of 2013, Mr. Flaherty stepped in and publicly called for "responsible lending" because he worried about an overheated housing market.

In a scrum with reporters in Ottawa Thursday, Mr. Oliver declined to answer "hypothetical negative" questions about what it would take for him to intervene. The minister was informed of the decision late Wednesday afternoon, before the move was made public, by Bank of Montreal CEO Bill Downe.

"We've been – over a long term – reducing the Canadian involvement in the mortgage market to protect the indebtedness of Canadian consumers and Canadian taxpayers and we'll continue on in that regard," Mr. Oliver said.

"There's a market and the bank made its decision," he added. "The chief executive officer of the Bank of Montreal informed me about it. I listened to his explanation, his reasons. I reiterated what I just stated which is the government is gradually reducing its involvement in the mortgage market."

Asked earlier whether Mr. Flaherty's departure had anything to do with the bank's decision, BMO spokesman Paul Deegan wrote in an e-mail that "the timing is driven by the fall in bond yields and that we are in what has traditionally been the busiest season for home buying." Five-year Government of Canada bond yields have risen slightly over the past two months, but BMO looked back six months to make its decision.

BMO's rate cut comes after Toronto-Dominion Bank lowered its four-year rate to 2.97 per cent earlier in March. Last week, shortly after Mr. Flaherty stepped down, Bank of Nova Scotia also slashed its mortgage rates, and instituted a special 2.94-per-cent four-year rate.

At least one credit union also moved its five-year rate to 2.99 per cent in February.

Story continues below advertisement

BMO's decision came the same day that Canada's biggest banks made it clear they are all but counting out the chance of a major correction in housing prices.

Despite doomsday scenarios from investors who are skeptical about the frothy real estate market, bank executives are now speaking with much more confidence about the likelihood that any correction, should one materialize, is likely to be a soft landing.

Their comments came one after the other at a bank conference on Wednesday.

"Do we see a major disaster in the housing sector? We don't think so," said Bharat Masrani, incoming chief executive officer at Toronto-Dominion Bank. In recent years, TD was one of the banks most concerned about a major price correction.

The bank CEOs and executives who spoke at the conference cited several reasons for confidence in the housing market: Sales-to-listing ratios aren't out of whack; federal immigration policies have allowed for record numbers of household formations; unemployment is falling, so homeowners are better able to make their mortgage payments; and there hasn't been a major uptick in mortgage loan losses at any of the Big Six banks.

Canada's mortgage underwriting standards are strict, ensuring that people cannot buy houses they can't afford, said David Williamson, head of retail banking at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

Story continues below advertisement

That's not to say that home prices won't fall. Many economists believe they will. Merrill Lynch, for instance, estimated that rising interest rates in 2016 could cause house prices to gradually decline 5 to 10 per cent over a couple of years.

Indeed, many experts say the market won't truly be tested until rates do rise. But even then, while higher rates would immediately crimp affordability for new buyers, it would take years for most homeowners' mortgages to be renegotiated at the higher levels.

It's at that point that the real impact of Canada's high consumer debt levels will become known. Canadians appear to be heeding warnings about piling on too much debt, and credit growth is now slowing. Some economists are hopeful that the debt-to-income ratio is near its peak and will start falling.

Even though mortgage lending isn't a glaring issue, overall levels of consumer debt are still a concern.

"I think the more prudent question is consumer debt and not just housing itself," TD's Mr. Masrani said.

The banks, with their immense mortgage businesses, have a natural bias toward the perception that home prices are sustainable. But senior bankers also know that they would be in hot water if they failed to spot a pending housing crisis.

Story continues below advertisement

"Are we watching this very carefully? Absolutely," National Bank of Canada CEO Louis Vachon said. "Are Canadians genetically immune to financial crisis? No. We're not delusional. We're not arrogant enough to take our eyes off the ball."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies