Skip to main content

Steam billows from a stack at the U.S. Steel Canada plant in Hamilton in this file photo taken March 4, 2009.

MIKE CASSESE/REUTERS

A U.S. metals and mining company is offering to invest about $500-million to purchase U.S. Steel Canada Inc. and keep the troubled steel maker operating.

Bedrock Industries LP has emerged from among several contenders as the Ontario government's preferred candidate to complete the restructuring of U.S. Steel Canada, which is now into its third year.

Miami-based Bedrock is prepared to restructure the company with a cash infusion, a pension contribution and payments to the province of Ontario and U.S. Steel Canada's former parent, United States Steel Corp., said sources familiar with a deal reached between the province and Bedrock.

Story continues below advertisement

The deal is supported by the national office of the United Steelworkers union (USW) and gained qualified support from other stakeholders that have participated in the company's saga of protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act.

U.S. Steel Canada's chief restructuring officer William Aziz called it an important step forward.

Related: Court approves U.S. Steel plan to cut Canadian unit

Opinion: Liberal stimulus plan a chance to reinvigorate Canadian steel industry

A final restructuring agreement is subject to full agreements from several stakeholders, notably the two locals of the USW that represent workers at mills in Hamilton and Nanticoke, Ont.

In addition, the Ontario government will seek what amounts to an exit agreement from Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel that will help pay for some of the environmental liabilities left from more than a century of steel making in Hamilton and 30 years of production in Nanticoke, on the north shore of Lake Erie. U.S. Steel took over Stelco Inc. in 2007 and put the Canadian unit into creditor protection in September, 2014.

The Ontario government is a key stakeholder because of a $150-million loan it made to U.S. Steel to help finance a pension deficit when the company took over Stelco.

Story continues below advertisement

U.S. Steel Canada cited pension solvency deficiencies of $840-million when it filed for CCAA protection, which could be dumped into the lap of the province's Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund if the company is liquidated.

"The next core step is we have to resolve the environmental issues," said a source familiar with the transaction, who said he would not reveal specific elements of the deal. "This will be Canada versus U.S. Steel. Are they going to leave ugly or well?"

Other sources familiar with the agreement said the Bedrock offer includes a payment to U.S. Steel, which, in the court proceedings, has made a claim against its former unit.

The deal also includes payments to help cover health care costs of 14,000 unionized and salaried retirees, a key issue for the national office of the USW and its two locals. Those benefits, earned when the retirees or surviving spouses worked for Stelco or U.S. Steel, were eliminated during the court-supervised restructuring, although they were partly restored through a trust fund that included money from the provincial government.

The two operations employ about 1,750 unionized workers and there will be little impact on jobs, while wages will not be cut, the sources said.

USW Local 1005, which represents workers in Hamilton, said it has many concerns about the deal, including whether payments will be made to restore the health of the pension fund. The local also wants a full restoration of health care benefits.

Story continues below advertisement

David Cheney, a board member and principal of Bedrock, said the company believes U.S. Steel Canada has high-quality assets and strong management and labour teams.

"We intend to allow them to execute their plan and execute their ideas," Mr. Cheney said.

He said he could not talk about the details of the transaction.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies