Skip to main content

Investment Canada amendments are contained in a budget omnibus bill, tabled by Minister Jim Flaherty last week and expected to be passed into law before the Commons recesses for the summer next month.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

The federal government is poised to pass Investment Canada amendments that will broaden its definition of "state-owned enterprises" and could subject SOEs' acquisitions of minority stakes in Canadian companies to investment reviews to determine whether they represent a net benefit to Canada.

The measures are contained in a budget omnibus bill, tabled by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty last week, and expected to be passed into law before the Commons recesses for the summer next month.

In a written analysis, lawyers at Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP say the amendments will add considerable uncertainty to the foreign investment review process for companies that have close ties to foreign governments – even if they are not state-owned – and go beyond what Ottawa promised last December when it first announced heightened foreign-investment scrutiny for state-owned enterprises.

Story continues below advertisement

The budget bill "introduces a new level of uncertainty into the federal government's treatment of proposed investments by SOEs which was not anticipated in December 2012," the Osler lawyers write.

Osler partner Shuli Rodal said the proposed amendments remove "safe harbour" assurances that allow foreign companies to acquire less than one-third of voting shares, or a minority interest in a trust, partnership or joint venture, without triggering Investment Canada review.

Companies in the cultural sector already have to demonstrate that they are not gaining de facto control through the purchase of minority shares, and now state-owned enterprises will face that same hurdle, Ms. Rodal said in an interview.

At the same time, Ottawa is giving itself broad discretion to decide who is state controlled.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced late last year that Ottawa would not allow additional foreign-government investment in the oil sands, even as he allowed CNOOC Ltd.'s $15.3-billion acquisition of Calgary-based Nexen Inc. and a $6-billion takeover of natural gas-rich Progress Energy by Malaysia's Petronas. While insisting Ottawa welcomes investment by state-owned enterprises elsewhere in the Canadian economy, the prime minister signalled a clear preference for their acquisition of minority stakes and said Ottawa would assess whether an investment would leave the Canadian firm under the influence of a foreign government, even if it did not involve a majority interest.

Prior to the Nexen decision, the investment banking community expected a wave of new deals involving state-owned enterprises in Canada, but very few have materialized.

Many critics, including the opposition New Democrats, urged Ottawa to clarify Investment Canada rules so that potential foreign investors would know what hurdles they faced before they attempt to do business in Canada. But the December policy announcement and proposed Investment Canada amendments create more, not less, ministerial discretion and greater uncertainty.

Story continues below advertisement

"Until somebody tests it, we won't know for sure how it will be applied," said Paul Boothe, a University of Western Ontario business professor and former senior official at Industry Canada. "So someone who wants to to do their deal and thinks they're in good shape will test this, and if it works, then we'll have a little more evidence no how this is being applied. But right now, people are going to be unsure about it."

In determining whether an investment by a foreign company should be reviewed under SOE guidelines, the minister can look at whether it has a minority government investment, commercial relationships with foreign governments or significant relationships with officials within government. So for example, Brazil's Vale SA is a publicly traded company but the Brazilian government exercises considerable influence and holds a "golden share," so Vale could be considered a state-owned enterprise under the new Investment Canada rules.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies