Skip to main content

Boeing’s protectionist push would be felt by consumers and carriers across the world

Mike Nadolski is vice-president, communications and public affairs, at Bombardier.

Boeing's recent petition seeking to impose a tariff on C Series aircraft sold in the United States is an unfounded assault on airlines, the travelling public and innovation in the aerospace industry. This protectionist ploy may help enhance Boeing's bottom line and dominant market position, but if it prevails, the harm to the industry and consumers will be felt far and wide.

We at Bombardier did not expect Boeing to welcome the C Series. We were, however, very disappointed that Boeing would make so many false claims in its petition to the U.S. government. We have an obligation, on behalf of our customers, the flying public and the tens of thousands of jobs that depend on the C Series in Canada and the United States, to set the public record straight.

Story continues below advertisement

As a starting point, Boeing alleges Bombardier sold C Series aircraft for $19.6-million (U.S.) apiece. This is wrong. It is nothing more than a back-of-the-envelope guess that is millions of dollars off the mark. In fact, buried in Boeing's filing, it discloses that this alleged "price" is based on an affidavit from a Boeing executive, with no firsthand knowledge of any price actually paid for any C Series aircraft.

Boeing also suggests that Bombardier sold the C Series to Delta at an unusual discount. This is wrong and it is ironic given that Boeing famously sold hundreds of its new 787 aircraft at steep discounts, including planes sold into Canada.

Boeing also incorrectly claims that its aircraft compete directly with the C Series. Boeing's claim is contradicted by the company's own executives, who publicly stated that their 737 Max family does not include an aircraft that actually competes with the C Series model selected by Delta. Indeed, Boeing did not even participate in the competition at Delta.

Airlines base purchasing decisions on a number of factors, including superior design. For Delta, the C Series's superior design was a critical factor. As Delta's then-CEO said after the selection, "Let's be blunt about it – Bombardier created a better piece of technology than the other guys."

Boeing's attempt to set up artificial market barriers for the C Series should be seen for what it is – an attempt to force carriers to buy less efficient planes with configurations airlines do not want and with economics that do not deliver maximum value.

Finally, Boeing's petition brazenly distorts the government investments in Bombardier. It is well known that all countries with major aerospace industries provide support for their local companies. There are clear rules governing the boundaries of this support, which Bombardier and its government investors have scrupulously followed. Boeing, on the other hand, has a record of noncompliance, and the WTO has repeatedly found that Boeing benefited from massive illegal subsidies supporting the development of its new aircraft.

At Bombardier, we believe that open and fair competition serves a very important role in pushing the industry to innovate; to design and build aircraft that are more efficient, more reliable and more environmentally friendly. We would prefer to compete in the marketplace on the basis of our superior aircraft, and will demonstrate that commitment in the U.S. government's proceeding.

Story continues below advertisement

The C Series represents significant advances in commercial aviation. Its development and production represent thousands of high-skilled jobs in Canada and in the United States. We are proud of our employees, investors and suppliers who have worked together to bring this plane to the marketplace, and we look forward to delivering the C Series to our many existing and future customers.

Greater Toronto Airways is starting a new commercial flight in hopes of attracting business people who want to get across Lake Ontario quickly Globe and Mail Update
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.