Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The Globe and Mail is hosting a debate on the economy among the leaders of the three main political parties on Thursday at 8 pm (ET). Click here for more details.

Craig Alexander is vice-president of economic analysis at the C.D. Howe Institute and former chief economist at TD Bank Group.

The precipitous decline in the Canadian dollar has come as a shock to many businesses. Only a few years ago, forecasters were telling them to come to terms with a currency at par for the foreseeable future. Now, the Canadian dollar is worth close to 75 cents (U.S.) and could fall further. This is welcome news for the near-term economic outlook – the benefits to exporters will exceed the cost to importers, boosting economic growth. This demonstrates the value of Canada's flexible exchange rate regime that acts as a buffer when economic shocks occur, such as the recent tumble in commodity prices. However, there is a potential dark side to a sustained low-valued loonie, as it can erode productivity and dampen innovation, which should be a concern to policy-makers.

Story continues below advertisement

The experience of the 1990s and early 2000s, when the currency ultimately plunged to below 63 cents (U.S.), is insightful. The retreating loonie provided support to the domestic economy through a number of channels. It lifted international demand for Canadian exports. It raised corporate profits when export revenues were translated back into the local currency. It increased demand for domestic products relative to foreign imports that were made more expensive in Canadian dollars. However, the currency's weakness went so far and lasted so long that it reduced foreign competitive pressure on Canadian firms. And this had negative consequences.

Some economists became concerned that the perpetually low dollar was contributing to Canada's poor productivity performance. Less foreign competition allowed domestic firms to be complacent. There was strong evidence that Canadian firms invested less than their U.S. counterparts in productivity-enhancing processes and equipment. The weak currency contributed directly to this challenge, since the bulk of machinery is imported. These concerns over the dampening impact on productivity were regrettably coined as the "the lazy manufacturer hypothesis."

The hypothesis was contentious because it implied that companies were not taking actions to maximize profits. But the hypothesis had some element of truth. From 1990 to 2000, the cost of production for manufacturing in Canada (as measured by unit labour costs) expressed in U.S. dollars fell by 2.7 per cent, but a weaker exchange rate accounted for the majority of that decline. Meanwhile, production costs in Canada rose relative to those in the United States when assessed in domestic currency terms, implying that Canada became less competitive. Statistics Canada data on the entry of new firms and exit of existing firms also suggest that the low exchange rate had an impact in sheltering Canadian manufacturers from the full effect of rising global competition.

Competition is key. It is the crucible that forces businesses to change with the times and constantly innovate. Competition drives productivity. There are significant economic costs to having less productive firms protected from competition, either domestic or foreign. This is a difficult message for economists to communicate.

Productivity has a negative connotation to most Canadians. Many think that higher productivity means producing more with fewer employees or working harder, when it actually means being more efficient. The reality is that increased productivity has been the primary driver behind a rising standard of living for Canadians since the end of the Second World War.

The key issue is whether the extent and the duration of the weak currency eroded productivity by sheltering domestic firms from foreign competition. An analysis by Bank of Canada economist Ben Tomlin estimates that a 20-per-cent sustained depreciation in the real exchange rate could result in a more-than-four-percentage-point reduction in plant productivity, which is a meaningful impact.

The research does show that the impact diminishes over the long run. The profits created by being sheltered behind a weak currency eventually attract new companies to enter the market. More firms mean more competition, which drives less-productive companies out of the market or forces them to innovate. But the entrance of new companies and their impact on competition can take years, if not decades, to materialize.

Story continues below advertisement

How worried should Canada's next government be about the threat to productivity from today's lower dollar?

The answer is probably not unduly, but it bears monitoring, and the risks increase the lower the currency gets. The Canadian dollar has fallen by more than 25 per cent against the U.S. dollar, but it has gone from overvalued to moderately undervalued. Moreover, the decline relative to many other currencies has been less pronounced. Nevertheless, one of the most daunting challenges facing Canada at the moment is the economy's weak productivity performance, and sheltering low-productivity companies from competition is not helpful.

How should policy-makers respond? Let's start with what not to do.

Monetary policy is not the right tool. The low interest rates established by the Bank of Canada have contributed to the weak currency, but the overnight rate is set to achieve the 2-per-cent inflation target. Canada has been remarkably well served by this approach to monetary policy and any mission creep toward targeting the exchange rate would create unintended and undesirable consequences.

The more appropriate and effective response would be to introduce policies to heighten competition and stimulate stronger productivity growth. Examples of such measures include expanding bilateral and multilateral trade deals, reducing barriers to foreign competition in protected industries and eliminating domestic business subsidies. Moreover, there are a range of policies that could help to boost productivity beyond lifting competition, such as improving infrastructure, heightening incentives for applied research and development and investing in skills development.

In summary, the Canadian dollar's retreat is advantageous, as it will help lift economic growth in coming quarters. However, Canada needs to improve its productivity performance, and the extent to which low-productivity companies are sheltered behind a weak currency is not constructive. There are a range of policies Canada's next government can lean against the potential negative effects on productivity from the weak loonie. And the good news is that the most effective policies have considerable merit beyond just serving this objective. Efforts to raise productivity are ultimately about raising the well-being of Canadians.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies