Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

The proposed new bridge linking Windsor and Detroit has jumped through its final regulatory hoop, now that a U.S. federal judge has rejected an injunction that would have barred the U.S. Coast Guard from issuing the necessary construction permit.

Even the private operator of the existing 85-year-old Ambassador Bridge, which had sought the injunction while vainly pursuing its own unapproved bridge scheme, concedes that it may be out of legal manoeuvres to prevent the new span across the Detroit River. But that won't stop the toxic mix of money and politics from further delaying a project that should have been a no-brainer.

The bridge would unclog a key transportation route between Ontario's manufacturing heartland and the major markets of the U.S. Midwest, but its merits are beside the point when set next to the priorities of partisan wrangling in Washington.

Story continues below advertisement

The Obama administration had provided a crucial presidential permit for the project after no fewer than nine federal U.S agencies (and the Americans complain about other countries' bureaucracies!) had given it the green light.

But now comes the hard part: Getting Washington to fork out a mere $250-million (U.S.) to pay for its own customs plaza on the U.S. side of the bridge.

This seems like a small price for a government that loudly proclaims the importance of freer trade and the reduction of cross-border impediments. The problem is that Washington doesn't seem all that eager to back up its words with action, as its oft-delayed decision on the Keystone XL oil pipeline shows. At least with the pipeline, there is a groundswell of opposition from environmentalists, which makes it tough on an administration trying to prove it cares about things like climate change and greener energy.

There is no such public antagonism toward a new bridge at North America's busiest border crossing, one that would provide thousands of badly needed construction jobs in battered Michigan and Ontario for several years.

The Canadian government is so anxious to improve the congested conduit between southern Ontario manufacturers and nearby U.S. assembly plants and supply chains that it is already prepared to foot most of the projected price tag of $3.4-billion on both sides of the border. That includes the cost of acquiring the property in Michigan needed for feeder roads and ramps, as well as relocating utilities. The plan is to recoup those expenses through bridge toll revenues.

But Ottawa has understandably drawn a line in the asphalt over paying for another government's customs checkpoint, even if there is some sort of arrangement for reimbursement through tolls.

In Washington, politics always trumps logic, and the Republican-controlled Congress isn't about to throw its support to a bill introduced by a Michigan Democrat to cover the cost of the customs plaza.

Story continues below advertisement

The fact is that Ontario's flagging industrial sector needs the new bridge far more than its U.S. counterpart. Which is why politics-obsessed Washington is in no rush to make it happen. Its attitude could change after the Congressional election this fall, but for now the U.S. administration is betting that the pressure is on Canada to make its offer even better. It's right.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies