Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

ROB Insight is a premium commentary product offering rapid analysis of business and economic news, corporate strategy and policy, published throughout the business day . Visit the ROB Insight homepage for analysis available only to subscribers.

Melissa Mayer took on a tough assignment when she became CEO of struggling Web portal firm Yahoo Inc. last year. The company lacked for leadership, strategy and momentum, and faced a perception its employee culture was a big part of the problem.

In her first few months in the job, Ms. Mayer has made efforts to repair that elusive culture: She gave every employee a smartphone, offered them free cafeteria food, instituted cookie days and attempted to turn Yahoo into a "fun" place. But her morale-building initiative has apparently had a setback since a much-discussed internal memo ordering hundreds of employees who work from home on a permanent basis to relocate to company offices. Some critics have portrayed it as a draconian and spirit-killing move that will drive employees away and make notoriously fickle Silicon Valley job seekers avoid Yahoo.

Story continues below advertisement

The criticism seems a bit overblown. There is a lot of lip service paid to creative, fun cultures as the driving force behind successful companies, but the reverse is probably more accurate: an enjoyable work environment is often a naturally occurring by-product of a successful company. IBM, Oracle, Microsoft and SAP aren't exactly famous for being creative or fun, but they draw employees because they offer well paying jobs and the chance to work for thriving technology companies with career opportunities.

Many startup-seeking programmers are typically drawn to places where they can do exciting and stimulating work, in areas such as space robotics or mobile apps that can creatively destroy established industries. The existence of a playful work environment usually does not factor highly in what draws them to an employer. The existence of a playful work environment may be a draw, but not nearly as much as the chance to change the world that some Silicon Valley employers offer.

Meanwhile, it seems too many Yahoo employees might have been having a bit too much fun at the company's expense. Some Yahoo insiders have said that rather than being unnecessarily harsh, Ms. Mayer is merely making a long-needed change, ending a policy that was abused by many and will help reduce a chronic slacking-off problem within the company. Having too many employees working away from the office on a permanent basis – and apparently quite out of touch from colleagues and superiors – is a dumb way to manage a company, particularly if it hampers productivity or the collaborative forces that initially made Yahoo a success.

It may make Yahoo a bit less fun for a while, but if the payoff is a better, more successful company, the sour faces shouldn't last for long.

Sean Silcoff is a contributor to ROB Insight, the business commentary service available to Globe Unlimited subscribers. Click here for more of his Insights, and follow Sean on Twitter at @seansilcoff.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies