Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content



Coke doesn't need Monster to be hip Add to ...

Coca-Cola is more than a century old, but it wants to be hip. Even so, the company says it’s not about to buy energy-drink maker Monster Beverages, as a Wall Street Journal report suggested. That sounds mature – in a good way – even if Coke did leave the door open to build on its existing distribution relationship with Monster.

Monster’s double-digit growth has supercharged its stock to trade at an $11-billion (U.S.) market capitalization, more than 30 times its estimated 2012 earnings. That would make an outright purchase very expensive, even for Coca-Cola, which is worth more than $170-billion. With a premium thrown in, it would take approaching twice Coke’s $8.6-billion of profit last year to buy the company that deploys Monster Girls to promote drinks such as Khaos and Ubermonster to the extreme-sports set.

For that much money, Coke should be able to concoct its own homegrown youth elixir and marketing campaigns that give young consumers the rush they crave. And it could sell more of its beverages beyond the $31.9-billion American market for alternative soft drinks, where Monster has made the biggest impression. Coke’s vast international distribution network and deep pockets – it spent $5.8-billion on marketing against Monster’s $149-million in 2011 – should be more than enough to steal market share from the soft-drink upstart.

The spendthrift devil on Coca-Cola’s shoulder might argue the company has allowed Monster, which taps Coke’s distribution network to sell its drinks, to become a threat of sorts, even internationally. Monster’s sales outside the United States rose nearly 60 per cent in 2011 to account for one-fifth of gross sales. That’s up from 16 per cent of total sales in the prior year.

Still, there’s no call for haste. Coke distributes roughly half of Monster’s drinks in the United States, so it already gets a cut of those sales. And the Atlanta-based giant is far from desperate. Its shares have risen a healthy 43 per cent over the past two years, compared with the near flat-line performance of traditional rival PepsiCo. Sure, Monster’s stock has rocketed nearly 200 per cent. But the surge of energy may not last. Coke’s shareholders are better off if the company plays its own long game than if it pays top dollar for a faddish brand that could easily flame out.

Report Typo/Error

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeBusiness

  • Coca-Cola Co
  • Updated August 23 4:03 PM EDT. Delayed by at least 15 minutes.

More related to this story


Next story




Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular