Skip to main content

British Columbia has dealt a blow to Enbridge Inc.'s controversial Northern Gateway pipeline by formally rejecting the proposed project, but is the decision much of a blow to the company's financial prospects?

Not really. The pipeline and gas distribution giant could walk away from Northern Gateway tomorrow and it would have no impact on its top or bottom line outlook.

Enbridge, a long-time stock market darling, is forecasting steady earnings-per-share growth of 10 per cent to 12 per cent per year from 2011 through 2016. (The company got off to a steady start with a 10.6 per cent increase last year.)

Story continues below advertisement

Much of that growth depends on the company executing on a massive backlog of some 37 capital projects totalling $28-billion in value. The list, which UBS analyst Chad Friess called "an embarrassment of opportunity" in a recent report, includes pipeline expansions, refurbishments, line reversals and facilities construction, all designed to expand Enbridge's capacity to move oil and gas from the Alberta oil sands and the Bakken region south of the border. These projects are all "commercially secured" – meaning a customer has been signed up in each case.

Notably absent from the backlog list: the $6.6-billion Northern Gateway project. The pipeline, which would connect the Alberta oil sands to the Pacific Coast, is part of a separate pile identified as "unsecured" projects, which totals $9-billion.

Enbridge has been highly successful in recent years in converting projects to "secured" status from unsecured. At the end of 2010, the company's backlog of secured projects under development totalled just $6-billion – or less than the value of the Northern Gateway project.

Now, there are so many projects in an advanced state – and only a handful, including the proposed reversal of a line between Sarnia and Montreal, which have met with any political resistance – that Northern Gateway barely merits a mention in bullish analyst reports on Enbridge. "We have never modelled in Northern Gateway into our valuation on future estimates," one analyst told ROB Insight.

There are risks to Enbridge's rosy outlook, of course. More oil spills, which have placed the pipeline industry under an unfavourable spotlight, could cloud long-term development plans. Rival pipeline company TransCanada Corp. could siphon away volumes with the planned conversion of its natural gas Mainline to crude. But Enbridge looks well positioned to meet such challenges.

Another risk is the debt that Enbridge will add to finance its development. But credit rating agency DBRS has given the company an A rating, noting the projects are expected to provide "relatively low-risk earnings and cash flow growth potential" over and above the company's "regulated, diversified and low-risk" operations. With $10.8-billion in available liquidity, Enbridge will not face a cash crunch any time soon.

Enbridge stock is trading well above its five-year average price-to-earnings multiple, suggesting the stock may be getting a bit ahead of itself. But the company's current stretch of good fortune has a few years left to run. For the time being, the debate over Northern Gateway should be little more than a sideshow for Enbridge investors.

Story continues below advertisement

Sean Silcoff is a contributor to ROB Insight, the business commentary service available to Globe Unlimited subscribers. Click here for more of his Insights , and follow Sean on Twitter at @seansilcoff .

------------------

The Globe is launching a Streetwise and ROB Insight newsletter, with content available exclusively to Globe Unlimited subscribers. Get the best of our exclusive insight and analysis delivered straight to your inbox in a daily e-mail curated by our editors. Sign up for it and other newsletters on our newsletters and alerts page .

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies