Skip to main content

For a firm like Goldman Sachs that is so used to standing out from the crowd, the prospect of being in the middle of the pack must grate beyond belief. But after a spate of governance and image problems, executives at the investment bank should relish its first-quarter results getting lost in the crowd.

Goldman managed an annualized return on equity of 12.2 per cent. That's bang in line with universal banking rivals JPMorgan and Wells Fargo – and with what Citi's core business appears to have achieved. But its first quarter fell short of JPMorgan's investment bank, which, after stripping out the accounting hit on its own debt, cranked out a 23 per cent ROE.

The comparison isn't perfect. JPMorgan's unit doesn't carry the costs of the entire group. But other measures support the differences. Based on the imprecise value-at-risk metric, Goldman decreased its overall risk appetite to start the year while JPMorgan's increased slightly. And with its larger balance sheet and lending relationships, Jamie Dimon's bank may have benefited more from the sharp uptick in trading in interest-rate-sensitive businesses.

Story continues below advertisement

Goldman's prudent approach probably translated into lower revenue than traders might otherwise have generated. But the result also could offset some concerns that the bank led by Lloyd Blankfein treats clients like muppets, an accusation levelled by a mid-level employee in a stinging and public letter of resignation.

Governments, which haven't always been happy with Goldman's actions, should at least be pleased with the latest figures. A third of the bank's earnings were allocated to global state coffers, far more than its 18.7 per cent tax rate in the previous quarter. Compensation, at 44 per cent of revenue, is still higher than some peers. That arguably shortchanges shareholders – but Goldman's board, which recently flouted good governance with its choice of a lead director – also opted to hand them a greater share of profit by raising the dividend by almost a third.

This not-too-hot, not-too-cold earnings dish is decidedly average. But the lack of much, if anything, to pick on also must provide a welcome respite for Goldman.

Report an error
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.