Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

It appears BlackBerry Ltd. CEO John Chen said something Wednesday that didn't quite come out right. That doesn't mean he was wrong to say it. But it does speak to how tricky the rookie executive's task is in communicating to two key audiences with different priorities – his customers on the one hand, and investors on the other.

In an interview with Reuters, Mr. Chen was asked what he would do with the beleaguered company's handset business – which made it famous but in recent years has been shrinking dramatically and bleeding red ink – if he can't make it profitable. "If I cannot make money on handsets, I will not be in the handset business," he replied.

Reuters dutifully reported that BlackBerry's CEO would consider exiting the handset business if he can't turn it around. It also reported that Mr. Chen believes he can turn a profit on handsets, even with shipments of as few as 10 million a year. (That's less than one-fifth of its shipments as recently as three years ago, although the company recorded revenue on only 1.3 million shipments in its most recent quarter, suggesting it's got some work to do.)

Story continues below advertisement

But on Thursday morning, Mr. Chen saw fit to clarify. In a post on the Inside BlackBerry blog website, he wrote his comments in the Reuters story "were taken out of context," and assured BlackBerry handset users that "I have no intention of selling off or abandoning this business any time soon … Our focus today is on finding a way to make this business profitable."

Reuters, for its part, is standing behind its original reporting. BlackBerry is not suggesting that he was misquoted – only that there's more to the handset strategy story. Specifically, that Mr. Chen's priority is to restore the segment to profitability – not to devise an exit strategy.

There really wasn't that much new in Mr. Chen's quote in the Reuters interview, other than perhaps its bluntness. Pretty much from the day he started, late last year, Mr. Chen was clear that he wasn't going to continue losing money on the devices. His first choice is to find a way to make money on more modest handset volumes, but he won't wait forever for that to happen. He can't – the company simply can't afford it.

Investors needed to hear that, and they need to be reminded: More good money will not continue to be poured after bad in handsets, as the company's previous leadership did to its near-destruction. If investors were getting nervous that BlackBerry's recent recommitment to its popular function keys and its Bold handset were signs of backsliding into old bad habits, Mr. Chen's statement should have shaken them from such thoughts.

But customers who rely on the devices get understandably nervous with such blunt talk. They want to know that the company is behind the handsets, that it's not going to abandon them. It's hard to sell them when people aren't convinced you'll be there to support them. Hence the reassurances that BlackBerry is committed to the business.

The handling of the Reuters situation may have been a bit clumsy, leaving the sense of a mixed and inconsistent message. But the reality for both customers and investors is that the clock is ticking on Mr. Chen's turnaround plan, and his patience on handsets is limited. That's a message that both groups need to understand loud and clear.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies