Skip to main content

ROB Insight is a premium commentary product offering rapid analysis of business and economic news, corporate strategy and policy, published throughout the business day. Visit the ROB Insight homepage for analysis available only to subscribers.

The federal government, if suitably motivated, could double GDP growth in 2014 and 2015 without too much inconvenience in the short term. How this would happen, and the reason it shouldn't, gets to the heart of the slow-motion train wreck that is China's midterm economic future.

It's a wreck that is going to be felt in the portfolios of Canadian investors. Any nation's GDP equals private consumption, plus investment, plus net exports – plus government spending. So, everything else being equal, increases in public-sector expenditures flow through directly to GDP (although the relationship isn't one-to-one for all sorts of complicated reasons).

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian GDP is approximately $1.7-trillion (U.S.). To boost economic growth by a large amount, the increase in government spending would have to be monumental – tens of billions of dollars.

But the government could do it. Federal finances are healthy and global demand for highly rated sovereign debt remains high. So Ottawa could borrow the funds, initially at rates between 2.5 and 3.0 per cent.

The actual increase in government spending could take any number of forms. The Gordie Howe International Airport could be built in Floral, Saskatchewan. A high-speed rail (HSR) line could connect Vancouver to Halifax. Dated public housing could be demolished and rebuilt to the delight of construction companies and cement producers nationwide.

This strategy, which would resemble much of what China is doing right now, would generate a short-term boom – but end in economic disaster. The HSR line would run at a massive loss. Gordie Howe Airport would operate at 20-per-cent capacity.

The feds, after borrowing the funds at 3 per cent and higher, would see no increase in government revenue to offset the added interest costs. The added debt burden would be sitting there for our grandkids.

In China, the signs of this type of malinvestment are well documented. At a recent conference, the head of China's Civil Aviation Administration, Li Jiaxiang, noted that 134 of China's 175 regional airports are operating at a loss. Despite that, the plan is to build 55 more airports by 2015.

Money is also being spilled with abandon on high-speed rail projects. Beijing-based Caixin Media pointed out that "two months after its February 2010 opening, the high-speed Beijing-Fuzhou line quietly closed for a lack of passengers. Reports said not a single seat was booked during the 10 days before the decision to scrap the 2,058-kilometer line."

Story continues below advertisement

In the Chinese economy, the debt taken on to build this infrastructure is not always held at the government level. The loans are held on corporate balance sheets, on off-balance sheet vehicles run by local governments and within the short-term savings vehicles known as wealth management products. In the latter case, the country's own central bank chairman Xiao Gang has admitted that the asset class is "fundamentally a Ponzi scheme."

China's non-government, non-bank debt has climbed to over 200 per cent of GDP – from less than 140 per cent in 2008 – just as overall economic growth is slowing. This is a sure sign that investment is becoming less efficient and non-performing loans are piling up.

Problems are being swept under the rug. In many cases bad loans are hidden in the off-balance sheet government investment vehicles. In others, corporations unable to make payments on debt receive government-ordered extensions on the terms of the loans. They still won't make payments.

The Chinese economy is still on track to become the world's largest by 2030. But the country has built scores of unprofitable airports, underutilized high-speed rail lines and bridges to nowhere. A financial reckoning, and a slower pace of growth, is all but inevitable.

Canadians have benefited from China's amazing expansion and the resource demand it has generated. But domestic investors can no longer depend on Chinese growth to support their resource-based investment returns. The sooner they reallocate their portfolios, the better.

Scott Barlow is a contributor to ROB Insight, the business commentary service available to Globe Unlimited subscribers. Click here to read more of his Insights , and follow Scott on Twitter at @SBarlow_ROB .
The Globe is launching a Streetwise and ROB Insight newsletter, with content available exclusively to Globe Unlimited subscribers. Get the best of our exclusive insight and analysis delivered straight to your inbox in a daily e-mail curated by our editors. Sign up for it and other newsletters on our newsletters and alerts page

.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies