Skip to main content

Reuters Breakingviews delivers agenda-setting financial insight. Its global correspondents react to stories as they develop, delivering sharp and provocative commentary on big financial news as it breaks. Click here to read more international insights.

Unleashing job hoppers could give the U.S. economy a bounce. Legislators in some states may be naive to think that outlawing non-compete contracts, which can block even laid-off workers from joining rival firms, will reduce unemployment. But recent studies suggest that a ban could boost economic performance. That's reason enough to give the proposals a shot.

So-called "non-competes" are a blunt way to stop former employees from sharing customer lists, business plans and other company secrets with competitors. They're generally legal if their prohibitions last for only a year or two and cover a limited geographic area.

Story continues below advertisement

With states struggling to cut unemployment rates, though, the agreements have come under fire as obstacles to finding work. Politicians in Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Virginia and, most recently, New Jersey have considered limiting non-competes. Under a New Jersey bill, for instance, they wouldn't bind laid-off workers eligible for unemployment insurance.

It makes sense that such measures would boost employment – and save on public benefits – but there's no hard evidence for that. In fact, non-competes are more likely to stop workers from leaving their current jobs than to keep the unemployed from finding new ones, according to employment lawyers.

Eliminating the agreements completely, however, seems to have economic benefits. California is the one state that prohibits non-competes. And several studies have found that the freedom of high-tech workers to change jobs and share ideas with competitors is a big factor in Silicon Valley's success.

Meanwhile, states that strictly enforce such contracts tend to lose valuable employees to states with looser requirements, according to a 2011 study from Harvard and MIT business schools.

Companies have a legitimate interest in protecting their business secrets, and even California allows them to enforce employee promises not to reveal confidential information.

But while non-compete agreements used to cover only Wall Street bankers and other rarefied breeds, they now apply to a broad range of employees. Making it tougher for those workers to get new and perhaps better jobs is unfair as well as economically suspect. Enacting limits on non-competes would be the right thing for states to do, even if it's for the wrong reasons.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter