Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

An aerial view of housing in Calgary is shown.

Jonathan Hayward

Finn Poschmann is president and chief executive officer of the Atlantic Provinces Economic Council.

The federal government is apparently once again batting around the idea of an insurance deductible for mortgage lenders whose insured loans go bad.

This will be popular among those who like the notion of forcing lenders to have "skin in the game." However, in the words of a November, 2015, Finance Department ministerial briefing note, it would have "potentially far-reaching impacts on lenders, borrowers and mortgage insurers."

Story continues below advertisement

That might seem like calm sentiment, but in permanent staff language, it says, "Here be monsters, Minister, but go ahead, and don't forget to write us when it all settles down."

The issues are simple. For several decades, Canada's chartered banks have dominated the residential mortgage lending market. And in our market, if a more-or-less creditworthy potential home buyer has less than 20 per cent for a home down payment, federal law says mortgage insurance is required. That has mostly been provided by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., a Crown agency.

When a mortgage loan goes bad (in arrears for 90 days), the borrower is typically still on the hook, but the insurer must make good any lender losses on the loan. So, through CMHC, the federal taxpayer pays.

There are two private mortgage insurers in the domestic market. When one of their insured loans goes bad, they are fully on the hook, and the taxpayer is not. One wrinkle: If the private insurer goes bust, the federal taxpayer is back on the hook for 90 per cent of the face value of those insured mortgages.

This federal guarantee enables lenders and insurers to do business without prohibitive capital requirements that would otherwise be imposed by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, in line with those required under the international (Basel) banking accord.

While that federal backstop enables the existence of private insurers, CMHC still historically held 60 per cent to 90 per cent of the market. This came to mean that federal taxpayers were directly guaranteeing a giant share of chartered bank assets – not a recipe for financial stability.

Accordingly, some of us pushed hard in the past decade, and successfully, for restraint in the growth of CMHC's insurance premium book, to create room for private insurers and investors to take on more risk.

Story continues below advertisement

To nudge that along, the federal government restricted the amount of mortgage insurance that CMHC could underwrite, and restricted growth in the amount of portfolio insurance – which covers bundles of otherwise uninsured mortgages that go into securitizations sold on to investors – so that CMHC now holds more like 50 per cent of the mortgage-insurance market. And we sharply raised the fees that CMHC charges lenders for guaranteeing securitizations, a profoundly market- and risk-oriented reform.

Amid this tightening, there has been some loosening, allowing the growth of mortgage-funding channels that don't carry taxpayer guarantees. Canada has now legislated a covered-bond framework, which allows lenders to create a pool of low-risk, uninsured mortgages that backstop covered-bond issuance on global markets, bonds that are further backed by the full faith and credit of the issuer. These are secure enough that when the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce went to market with them in July, the bonds were priced at a zero coupon rate and sold with a negative yield.

This kind of funding channel is relatively new to Canada, and it has room to grow if regulators let it, without taxpayer guarantees.

So where does an insurance deductible fit in to the mortgage marketplace?

The first answer is that it does fit most finance and insurance markets – just not the one Canada has built.

Hence those "potentially far-reaching impacts," some of which are predictable. We have to figure out who's on the hook for the deductible when the lender has sold on a mortgage through a securitization. That affects the market value of the security.

Story continues below advertisement

The second thing we know is that costs will go up. Bank capital requirements will increase, as will the costs of running a mortgage-lending business. This is what economists call a supply shock, and the result is that markets will clear at higher prices and lower volumes.

And potential borrowers will have less access to credit. Lenders and insurers will do more market-risk segmentation and less risk-sharing among their customers, which is no fun for those of us in housing markets where income levels are less stable. The regional impacts would not be pretty.

Canadians are right to worry about occasionally frothy housing markets, and about how much risk their government exposes them to. But we have tools to respond. Unless we have reason to believe these tools aren't up to the job, we might best defer on skinning the mortgage lenders.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies