Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Peter Landry is a principal at Enterprise Canada, a leading public affairs firm with expertise in transportation and innovation.

There has been much media and water-cooler talk about Uber as a disruptive force in the transportation world, and rightly so. Uber has provided a great service – not only to taxi-weary folks but also to lovers of disruption everywhere. Viva La Revolución! While Uber is the current poster child for the great divide between regulators and leading technology, it is only one example of the increasing challenge for legislators to keep pace with change. This is not a phenomenon to be taken lightly. It can put the brakes on technology that offers real societal and environmental benefits.

The much-heralded driverless car has the potential to increase traffic safety and reduce fuel consumption. Are governments ready? They may argue that they are, but past record shows they will lag even to the point of stopping all things progressive dead in their tracks.

Story continues below advertisement

Currently, intelligent traffic systems that are available are stalled because of old-school government thinking. For example, in Canada, we still rely on pre-disco era truck weigh stations that require drivers to pull in for inspections. This not only wastes driver time, but also increases risk to other drivers as the trucks pull back on to the highway. It also causes millions of litres of fuel to be burned during the process. Better options exist, but archaic regulations do not allow them.

And it's not just futuristic technology that government needs to anticipate. The truth is that there is well-established hardware and software that remains ahead of the rules. For instance, only recently have we been catching up with cellphones and regulations relating to distracted driving. Never mind that our cars are quickly turning into mobile offices and, gasp, entertainment centres.

Different from Uber and intelligent traffic systems, this lack of foresight and synchronicity is not limited to efficiency – it's a matter of life and death – and there have already been grave consequences. Although cellphone technology (including the dreaded texting) has been around for years, decision-makers have been reactive instead of pro-active. This has effectively caused a distracted-driving epidemic that has resulted in thousands of injuries and deaths.

Aside from distracted drivers possessing a severe lack of common sense and blatant disregard for people's lives, it's hard to place all of the blame on them. The drag in policy implementation has allowed society to grow accustomed to using cellphones while driving. Like they say, old habits die hard.

This in all likelihood could have been prevented, had government – and even those responsible for developing technology – done a better job of planning ahead and bracing for the potential impacts. Crazy as it sounds, there are times when the public and private sector must work together.

Innovators also have to change their approach. It's easy to point fingers at governments. It's harder to do a little looking in the mirror and ask the question about what the private sector has done to achieve a better equilibrium between the rules and the technology.

Even Uber, which is active in the public policy arena, ironically takes an old-school approach to government relations. But at least Uber is in the game. Technology innovators have the brains to invent things that amaze us. Yet they can be, ummm, senseless when it comes to helping governments pave the regulatory road.

Story continues below advertisement

Here are a few tips: align with government priorities; know the players both political and bureaucratic; engage the public (read voters) in a positive manner (i.e. threats and hysteria do not work); include government relations in your business planning.

And no there is no app for any of this.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies