Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Churchill Falls still haunts Newfoundland nearly half a century later.

Under a now-infamous 1969 contract, Hydro-Quebec gets to buy virtually all the power from the Labrador hydroelectric project at pre-1970s oil crisis prices until 2041, with no adjustment for inflation. The arrangement is worth hundreds of millions of dollars in profits every year to the Quebec utility.

Never again, Newfoundlanders said. The province vowed to do things differently to exploit the hydro potential of the lower Churchill River, including the Muskrat Falls project.

Story continues below advertisement

And it did. Former premier Danny Williams rejected the idea of selling most of the power from Muskrat Falls to Hydro-Quebec, opting instead to go it alone. So the province is repatriating the power to Newfoundland and financing a circuitous underwater transmission line to Nova Scotia.

The unfortunate consequence of this energy hubris is that instead of being cheated by its neighbour, Newfoundlanders are fleecing themselves.

Delays and cost overruns on the $12.7-billion megaproject will cause residential hydro rates to more than double across Newfoundland by 2022. That's according to Nalcor Energy, the provincial Crown corporation that's building the project, with loan guarantees from Ottawa.

Even that fatalistic prognosis may be too optimistic. A new analysis by an anonymous poster on a popular Newfoundland public-policy blog says Nalcor is still lowballing the true cost of Muskrat Falls, which has already doubled in price. Consumers will see rates more than triple to 35 cents per kilowatt-hour within five years, up from less than 10 cents now, according to the poster. That's twice the highest rates anywhere in Canada.

The province and Nalcor declined to comment directly on the 35-cent forecast. But Natural Resources Minister Siobhan Coady said in an e-mailed statement that the province has directed Nalcor to explore "all options" to hold rates down, including importing cheaper electricity from other provinces and finding new export customers. Nalcor, likewise, says it is looking at "all reasonable measures" to minimize the impact of Muskrat Falls on customers.

Premier Dwight Ball has said he'll never let rates double – implying the province may have to subsidize rate payers for decades to come.

Depending on what happens elsewhere in Newfoundland's highly energy-dependent economy, such subsidies would weigh heavily on the province's finances for a long time. The province's debt has ballooned in the past three years amid falling oil revenues. Getting back to balance depends heavily on reducing expenses, not on spending millions to subsidize electricity rates.

Story continues below advertisement

Newfoundland is not alone in putting politics ahead of sound economics when it comes to energy megaprojects. Provincial monopolies, powerful entrenched bureaucracies and regional jealousies have created a balkanized energy system across Canada that too often serves the few at the expense of efficiency and the national interest.

The result is that Canadians pay far more for their electricity than they should.

Newfoundland would have been better off giving everyone in the province big energy rebates and mothballing Muskrat Falls, which will cost every Newfoundlander more than $24,000.

But with Muskrat Falls nearly 80-per-cent complete, there is no going back.

Nalcor chief executive Stan Marshall, who inherited the project, has been surprisingly blunt about his company's big venture. He says Muskrat Falls is a "boondoggle" that is "a hell of a lot worse" than the 1969 Churchill Falls contract.

"It should never have been built," he told reporters earlier this year. "But it's too late to stop. We couldn't go and get a refund."

Story continues below advertisement

He might not want to admit it, but the original Churchill Falls deal was never as bad as it's been characterized. It was a product of its time – before the oil crisis, hyperinflation, deep-water drilling and hydraulic fracking. Energy contracts are priced with the best available information at the time.

Many also forget that Hydro-Quebec put up much of the money to build the project and assumed the risk of finding customers for the power and laying hundreds of kilometres of transmission lines.

Not getting a better price was a lost opportunity for Newfoundland. But the province didn't need the power back then. Its leverage was limited, and it assumed relatively little of the risk.

By trying too hard to make amends for perceived mistakes of the past, Newfoundland has poisoned its financial future.

It's a steep price to pay for energy independence.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies