Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

There were some very disappointed dairy farmers after the 12-country Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal was struck last week. But the unhappiest milk producers weren't in Canada.

For New Zealand's giant dairy co-operative, Fonterra, the final TPP agreement fell far short of the "original ambition" negotiators expressed at the outset of the talks, as the "entrenched protectionism" of U.S. and Canadian milk producers yielded a deal far short of its potential.

"What's so special about the dairy farmers [in North America] that they get a get-out-of-jail-free card compared to everyone else who works for a living?" Andrew Hoggard, dairy industry chairman at the Federated Farmers of New Zealand, scoffed in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corp. "I'm hopeful that consumers and taxpayers in all these other countries will look at their dairy farmers and go, 'Well, hang on, how come the beef farmers and the arable farmers and the pork farmers can all handle the big wide world, and yet you guys are still clutching to the apron strings and refusing to put on the big kiddie pants?'"

Story continues below advertisement

So far, consumers and taxpayers here have shown few signs of revolt. And if the Conservatives are falling over themselves to coddle Canada's dairy farmers – promising $4.3-billion in aid to offset the impact of a slight opening of the domestic market to imports – it's unlikely that a Liberal or New Democratic Party government would subject milk producers to any tougher love.

Under the TPP, Canada has agreed to open its market to dairy imports (everything from butter, cheese, milk powder and whey to liquid milk) from the United States, New Zealand and other TPP countries equivalent to 3.25 per cent of domestic production. Producers in other supply-managed agricultural sectors, such as poultry and egg farmers, will face imports amounting to around 2 per cent of the Canadian market.

In exchange for these concessions, which will total about 5 per cent of the Canadian dairy market once the pending Canada-Europe free-trade deal is implemented, Ottawa will pay farmers in supply-managed sectors $2.4-billion in income support and $1.5-billion to prop up the value of their production quotas. Income support will be paid out over 15 years, quota support over 10. An additional $450-million will go to help processors modernize their operations.

For compensation to make economic sense, rather than just good politics, it needs to encourage dairy farmers to increase their competitiveness and prepare for the day when supply management is done away with. But the Harper government insists, on the contrary, that the three pillars of supply management – regulated prices, production quotas and import controls – will remain fully intact under the TPP.

"The irony is that [under the auspices of a free-trade agreement,] we seem to be spending a very large amount of taxpayer money to support a system that is the antithesis of free trade," says Martha Hall Findlay, an executive fellow at the University of Calgary School of Public Policy. She argues for phasing out a supply-management system that forces the average Canadian family to pay about $300 a year more than necessary for dairy products.

The small market share allotted to dairy imports under the TPP and European deal probably will not be enough to meaningfully drive down prices here, Ms. Hall Findlay adds. "So, this would mean a double hit for taxpayers. They'll still be paying far too high, virtually unchanged consumer prices, yet be stuck paying a huge $4.3-billion bill to a very small number of already relatively affluent farmers."

The common refrain that opening Canada's market to more imports would subject farmers here to unfair competition from subsidized U.S. producers is no longer valid, Ms. Hall Findlay says. The U.S. Agricultural Act of 2014 eliminated the three main dairy-support programs. And while it maintained a subsidized margin-insurance program, the latter is only minimally used.

Story continues below advertisement

In a note for the Institute for Research on Public Policy, economist Dmitry Lysenko and Carleton University professor Saul Schwartz also slam the $4.3-billion compensation package for farmers as inefficient and inequitable. "These programs effectively stifle incentives for the sector to change … [They] should be seen as unfair to workers and firms affected by economic developments other than trade agreements. Such ad hoc assistance is better understood as a political strategy to mitigate opposition to trade liberalization by specific groups, rather than a serious effort to facilitate economic adjustment and minimize social consequences."

Of course, Canada could not end supply management overnight. But a long-term plan to phase out quotas and open our borders would be in everyone's interest. The TPP could have been that opportunity. Not only did the politicians fail to seize it – they're making taxpayers pay for their failure.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies