Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The Baxter robot at a Pennsylvania plant of K’Nex Brands LP.

When K'Nex Brands LP recently brought some of its plastic toy production from China back to its home base in Pennsylvania, it was viewed as a victory for American manufacturing. President Barack Obama toured the factory in November and The Wall Street Journal later celebrated the company's success with the headline, "A Toy Maker Comes Home to U.S.A." But while employment at the K'Nex factory has risen with the "reshoring" from China, one new worker isn't being paid: the Baxter robot.

It's a cute-looking thing, as robots go, with human-like arms and facial expressions. It can work alongside people and is capable of learning simple, repetitive tasks, making it a welcome addition to small-scale manufacturing. But it also represents a new direction for robots, as their versatility and affordability pushes them deeper into the workforce. If low-cost China can't compete with a robot like Baxter, who can?

Mechanization has always raised concerns about the impact on human jobs. And while those concerns have been allayed with rising employment, as humans find new and more productive things to do, economists aren't so sure that the trend will continue as robots proliferate. There are signs that the labour market is already shifting. MIT's Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, authors of Race Against the Machine, point out that the digital era has had an unsettling impact as capital wins a bigger share of the economy: Corporate profits as a share of U.S. gross domestic product are at a 50-year high, while compensation to labour has fallen to a 50-year low. The average worker, they believe, is being left behind by new technologies.

Story continues below advertisement

Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist and Princeton University professor, has picked up on this theme, arguing in The New York Times that technological disruption could be the reason why corporate profits are at record highs even as the U.S. economy continues to struggle.

No one wants to look like a modern-day Luddite, opposing the use of new technology, so robots are here to stay. But if low-skilled workers fail to find new jobs to replace the ones they lost to mechanization, their futures will look bleaker than ever. Robots may not take control of the economy, but robot owners will.

THREE ROBOTS WITH JOBS

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies