Skip to main content

A woman walks past a Rogers sign in Toronto, on April 21, 2015.

MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

Rogers Communications Inc. is considering the sale of assets such as baseball's Toronto Blue Jays and its stake in a smaller cable and media company to free up capital for its main communications businesses.

The media giant's chief financial officer Tony Staffieri said Tuesday at an industry conference that the company is looking for ways to "surface value" from the Blue Jays – which he said is a "very valuable asset for us that we don't get full credit for."

He didn't discuss who might buy the team, or if a deal would include the Rogers Centre, or what they would be worth.

Story continues below advertisement

"To be clear, there isn't anything imminent that we are about to announce, but we're certainly looking at the alternatives. Again, would like to get the content without necessarily having the capital tied up on our balance sheet," Staffieri said.

Aravinda Galappatthige, an analyst who covers Rogers for Canaccord Genuity, writes that the issue of assets sales has been raised before but Staffieri's comments are the most explicit to date.

He estimates that the Blue Jays would be worth about $3.20 per share of Rogers, based on an estimated value of $1.65-billion for the team.

But Galappatthige notes that Rogers has other non-core assets including a 37.5 per cent interest in Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment, which owns the Toronto Maple Leafs hockey team and Toronto Raptors basketball team, and the Rogers Centre – worth $200-million to $400-million.

In total, he estimates Rogers has non-core assets that could be worth close to $5-billion or $9.70 per Rogers share.

"However, we highlight that while asset sales are being considered at a high level, we do not believe there any imminent deals in place at this time," Galappatthige writes.

Staffieri said the company is currently going through its budgeting process for 2018 and the focus will be on revenue growth and better margins at its wireless and cable divisions.

Story continues below advertisement

Staffieri made the comments during an onstage interview at the UBS Global Media and Communications conference in New York, according to transcripts of the event provided by Thomson Reuters.

Rogers has previously indicated it is exploring ways to get more value from its portfolio of assets, including the Jays, but Staffieri's comments in New York were more specific.

He said the company still wants rights to sports programming – which is core to the company's media business – but doesn't need to own a team to have that, pointing to the company's 12-year deal with the National Hockey League.

"Relative to our overall asset portfolio, media is small," Staffieri said.

But he said sports content continues to have "healthy" margins and can complement the Rogers wireless and cable operations as well.

"Our focus in media will continue to be on the sports side of it. So don't expect any type of expansion on the media side, other than continue to monetize the sports assets that we have," Staffieri said.

Story continues below advertisement

As for the company's investment in Montreal-based Cogeco and Cogeco Communications Inc., a smaller cable and media company based in Montreal, Staffieri's said there's "probably better use" for that capital.

"There were some strategic benefits that we had hoped for with Cogeco and those seem to be further and further away," Staffieri told the UBS conference.

Galappatthige said Rogers' share in the two Cogecos would be worth about $2.98 per share, for about $1.53-billion.

"While we would expect an orderly sell-down in its Cogeco holdings, this could put pressure on Cogeco Inc.'s and Cogeco Communications' share prices and serve to remove any takeout premium currently imbedded in their stock prices," he concluded.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.