Skip to main content

The Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/CP

The Supreme Court of Canada has refused to hear an appeal by former Dragons' Den contestant John Turmel, who launched a lawsuit claiming he was libelled by the popular CBC television program.

Mr. Turmel taped an episode of the show in 2009, inviting the panel of entrepreneurs to invest $100,000 in a program to use poker chips from a local casino as currency at local businesses in his home town of Brantford, Ont.

The business executives said they didn't understand what he was talking about, and mocked his pitch. Outspoken CBC personality Kevin O'Leary suggested he should "burst into flames" while Jim Trevliving suggested he was "blowing air up a dead horse's ass."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Turmel launched a lawsuit after the episode aired in 2010, claiming their comments were offensive and objecting to the way the item was edited to make his pitch sound worse.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the case in a ruling in July, saying Mr. Turmel signed a consent and release form that gave the CBC the right to air any portion of his pitch, or none at all.

"He made a calculated decision to sign the contract in order to participate in a taping and receive the opportunity to ask the Dragons for a $100,000 investment in his proposal," Mr. Justice Thomas Lofchik wrote in his decision. "He received what he expected."

Mr. Turmel sought leave to appeal further to the Supreme Court of Canada, but the top court turned down his appeal request Thursday. As with all cases in which the Supreme Court denies leave to appeal, it did not give reasons for the decision.

Mr. Turmel, who describes his occupation as "professional gambler," was cited by The Guinness Book of World Records for holding the record for running in the most elections, and for losing the most elections. He says he has run 74 times in municipal, provincial and federal elections.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies