Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

On Monday, Canadians will head to the polls in the final act of what has been the longest federal election campaign in history. At the outset of this campaign, there were some who were convinced that this would be Canada's first true "social media election," and that we would see the country's political parties roll out innovative social and digital techniques to secure a victory.

While all of the parties have undoubtedly made use of their various social channels and platforms, it would be hard to argue that any of the major parties have rolled out surprisingly new or innovative digital strategies.

At the same time, this election has taught us a great deal about the power of social platforms, the lasting impact of comments made online, and the rising power of the millennial generation and its shifting attitudes toward brand loyalty and the effect that can have on the major political parties.

Story continues below advertisement

If there was one leader who found an innovative way to use social media to raise her own profile, and that of her party, it was Green Party Leader Elizabeth May. Despite being officially excluded from key national debates, Ms. May didn't let that stop her from harnessing the power of social media and having her voice heard during the debates.

In a bold move, Ms. May leveraged Twitter to not only participate in debates, but actually dominate the conversation surrounding the debates online. While the debates were going on, Ms. May's campaign simply recorded video of her answering the same questions that were being put to the other leaders by the debate's moderator, then posting them online and to her social profiles. Even though she wasn't in the room, by inserting herself into the online discussions surrounding the debates as they happened in real time, she was able to get the Green Party message out there.

Although Ms. May didn't do anything particularly revolutionary from a technical standpoint, she simply used the tools she had to work with – a platform equally available to her competitors – in a pro-active way, ensuring that she, too, had a voice.

While Ms. May came out on top from a social media perspective, many other candidates weren't so lucky. Indeed, this campaign saw several politicians drop out of the race or face harsh criticism over long-forgotten comments made on Facebook and Twitter that were unearthed during the campaign.

As the first digital election, there was an opportunity to engage voters in a new way, but as we saw time and time again, there was also an opportunity to be haunted by tweets of the past. From Ala Buzreba's Twitter spat to Joy Davies's pro-pot Facebook post, Canadians watched repeatedly as the digital tattoos of these candidates were revealed, throwing their hopes of election into chaos. It was a hard lesson to learn for a handful of politicians this summer, but for most, it was an important reminder to think twice before you post something online. Over time, everybody's digital present becomes the record of their past, so make sure you keep yours clean.

Still, I can't help but feel that the underutilization of social media in general was a big miss for many Canadian politicians, given the mass millennial audience this election saw.

#elxn42 was expected to be the first federal election in Canada where the millennial generation plays a key role. Now making up the biggest generation in the Canadian work force, ignoring these young voters could be a fatal mistake for any party leader. Especially if the attitudes millennials tend to have toward brand loyalty begin to transfer over to the political process.

Story continues below advertisement

Businesses have learned the hard way that this generation won't just blindly follow a brand out of sheer loyalty. Young people today are swayed by ideas, sentiment and the bottom line. It's entirely possible that traditional voting blocks are disappearing, as this younger generation joins the pool. Millennials are much more likely to rally around an idea, not a party. Perhaps that's why election quizzes like the Vote Compass have become so popular; unlike previous generations, millennials are less likely to enter an election as a devout supporter of any particular party.

If election forecasts are to be believed, the race is tight. Which raises the question, Is the erosion of brand loyalty bleeding into politics? Could this be why none of the parties has been able to break through and take a commanding lead?

If the Alberta election in May taught us anything, it's that nothing is guaranteed until all the ballots have been counted. And this election, social media played a disappointing role.

Mia Pearson is the co-founder of North Strategic. She has more than two decades of experience in creating and growing communications agencies, and her experience spans many sectors, including financial, technology, consumer and lifestyle.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies