Skip to main content

Money Small businesses worried about the impact of Ontario pension plan

Steve Mastoras, managing director of Whistler’s Grille in Toronto, says the ORPP will force him to reduce staffing levels

Whistler’s Grille

Small business owners across Ontario say a new mandatory pension plan could force them to freeze hiring and slash both hours and wages for employees as they try to absorb the extra cost at a time when margins are increasingly tight.

The cuts could come sooner than the implementation of the Ontario Retirement Pension Plan (ORPP) – with starting dates ranging between 2017 for larger businesses (more than 500 staff), 2018 for medium (50 to 499 employees) and 2019 for the smallest ones (fewer than 50) – as businesses prepare for the added cost.

"I think it's going to impact the ability of small businesses to add to their staffing complement," said Steve Mastoras, managing director of Whistler's Grille in Toronto. "It's also going to impact hiring of young people, a generation that needs these jobs the most."

Story continues below advertisement

Small businesses are often celebrated as the engine of the Canadian economy, but Mr. Mastoras said they are constantly "under siege" from government decisions ranging from the recent minimum wage increase in Ontario to higher taxes, utility costs and increasing red tape.

"There's a cumulative effect on small business and this really is the last straw," said Mr. Mastoras of the ORPP, describing it as a "payroll tax."

He estimates the pension plan will cost his family-owned business, which employs 30 people, about $12,000 to $15,000 a year. That's on top of the extra $40,000 the business will pay from Ontario's increase in the minimum wage.

"We are going to have to take a serious look at our hiring decisions and make scheduling adjustments," Mr. Mastoras said. "It's going to add a tremendous new burden on small businesses."

The provincial government says the ORPP is needed as a supplement to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) for those who don't have workplace pensions. It argues the plan is good for economic spending in the long run, especially with data showing two-thirds of Ontario workers don't have a workplace pension plan.

However, group such as the Ontario Chamber of Commerce (OCC) and the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) say the ORPP targets small businesses that can least afford the extra expense.

"It is the single-worst policy change for small business in decades," said CFIB president and chief executive officer Dan Kelly. "It's true the vast majority of small businesses don't offer pensions. The main reason is they can't afford them. This does nothing to change that. The impact could be calamitous."

Story continues below advertisement

The OCC is happy the government exempted companies that provide Defined Contribution (DC) plans, and is giving smaller businesses more time to phase in the ORPP. However, the OCC stated, "we remain concerned that the ORPP in its current form will have a negative impact on business competitiveness."

The ORPP requires both employees and employers to contribute 1.9 per cent of eligible earnings up to a maximum of $90,000. That's $2.16 a day for people making $45,000 a year and amounts to $6,410 per year in retirement benefits if they contribute for about 40 years, according to the province. For someone making $90,000 a year, the contribution amounts to $4.50 a day or $12,815 a year in retirement. Benefits will start to be paid out in 2022.

Those numbers are based on actuarial analysis of what workers can expect to receive, and the formula is designed to replace 15 per cent of pre-retirement earnings. The province says it's continuing to analyze other plan models, such as the Minimum Earning Threshold, the level below which contributions would not be required.‎

Birgit Cooper, president and co-owner of Markham-based art supplies company Heinz Jordan and Co. Ltd., said the ORPP comes as her business is already struggling in the increasingly competitive retail space.

"With the economic climate for small business tough in the first place, and this on top of it … It's not a happy time," said Ms. Cooper.

She has already started to cut hours for her six employees in a tough business climate and may have to reduce staffing numbers as a result of the ORPP.

Story continues below advertisement

"What bothers me is that, as a small business owner, most people knew coming into this business that there was no pension, and that it was up to them to take care of their own needs," Ms. Cooper said.

Many of her staff are in their 40s and 50s and have been saving for retirement on their own. They will have to pay into the ORPP starting in 2019, but won't see the benefit until years later, Ms. Cooper notes.

"I don't think [the ORPP] should be mandatory. It should be something that you can opt in if you want," Ms. Cooper said.

Mitzie Hunter, provincial associate minister of finance in charge of pensions, said the ORPP is good for business and the Canadian economy in the long run, because it helps secure retirement savings for people without an employee pension plan.

"We don't want people to retire without adequate income. That has the potential to slow consumption. That's not good for the individuals, that's not good for business and that's not good for Ontario's economy," which could in turn put pressure on publicly-funded programs, Ms. Hunter said in an interview.

Ontario wants to combine its pension administration system with the federal government's, which would allow businesses to deal with just one body. Ms. Hunter said the federal government has so far refused to co-operate with this request.

Story continues below advertisement

There is also some uncertainty around whether the ORPP will go ahead if a Liberal or NDP government is elected federally in October. Unlike the Conservative government, the two opposition parties are in favour of expanding the CPP as a way to help Canadians save more for their old age.

Asked whether the ORPP could be dropped if the Conservatives lose the election, Ms. Hunter said, "it's not that straightforward," given that the other provinces would also have to agree to an expanded CPP.

Follow @GlobeSmallBiz on Twitter

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter