Skip to main content

Scott Moore, Rogers’ president of broadcasting, inside one of the Sportsnet studios on Jan. 7, 2013. Sportsnet has become a revenue driver in Rogers Media.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

Profits may be down sharply at Rogers Media Inc., but the Sportsnet network of television channels has emerged as a star performer among its parent company's holdings.

Rogers Communications Inc. saw its revenue increase by $106-million compared to last year to $3.2-billion in the second quarter, and its media division accounted for 30 per cent of the increase. It wasn't its magazines or baseball team bringing in the cash – Sportsnet brought in about $30-million more than a year ago as it charged other television providers more money to air the stations.

Another $7-million in new revenue came from its newly acquired Sportsnet 360, which was formerly The Score prior to Rogers' $167-million acquisition.

Story continues below advertisement

While revenue increased in the media division (which includes magazines such as Maclean's and Chatelaine, radio stations, the City television network and the Toronto Blue Jays), profits were harder to come by thanks to a higher payroll for the underperforming Blue Jays and the need to broadcast a flurry of National Hockey League games to make up for time lost during the lockout.

Combined, the two added $35-million in expenses to the media division's balance sheet in the quarter and helped drag the media division's profit 19 per cent lower compared to a year ago to $64-million of the parent company's $532-million profit.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies