Skip to main content

Manulife Financial CEO Donald Guloien

ADRIEN VECZAN/REUTERS

It was once hard to believe Manulife Financial Corp. would ever escape the capital troubles that haunted it through the financial crisis.

But when Canada's largest insurer reported its fourth-quarter results on Thursday, it seemed a pivotal moment for the company: more attention was being paid to sales growth than capital concerns.

Manulife's capital issues have long been worrisome to analysts and investors. Fluctuating market conditions and declining bond yields meant the insurer spent years trying to reassure onlookers that its capital levels were healthy, or at least under control.

Story continues below advertisement

Now, after more than four years of hedging and slashing sales of products such as variable annuities, which promised to pay customers a minimum payment but were tied to a stock portfolio that plunged, the company's chief executive officer said Thursday he believes the worst is over, and that the marketplace is finally giving the firm a fresh look.

"It takes a while for people to understand that a company or a person has changed, but the market is now catching up to that and realizing that we're now managing quite a different company," said Donald Guloien. Manulife's shares climbed by 7 per cent through January, and added another 3 per cent since fourth quarter earnings were announced Thursday morning.

But getting there wasn't easy. In 2008, the company was hit hard by slumping equity markets and had to turn to investors to raise billions to boost its balance sheet. Manulife halved its dividend to protect that money, and took steps to hedge its stock market exposure. The huge decline in interest rates sucked more and more out of the company's capital pool.

Different ideas about what the company could do to increase its capital levels were batted around. One idea was to spin off its U.S. operations, John Hancock Financial Services Inc. That unit brought in double-digit insurance sales growth this quarter. Another idea was selling its Canadian bank.

But while anxieties over capital levels continued to move the stock –sometimes more than quarterly earnings or losses – Manulife was making changes.

When the financial crisis hit, Manulife had done virtually no hedging of the portfolio of assets that backed its variable annuities. It began to put hedging measures in place, and has now met all its targets. Manulife's product mix is less exposed to market variation these days.

After all that, the company's CEO now believes that earnings, not its capital levels, are driving Manulife's stock price again.

Story continues below advertisement

"I think what you observe is that there's far less volatility in Manulife's stock price relative to market movement, because there's growing recognition of the amount that we've hedged and the change in the product mix that we have effected over the last three years," Mr. Guloien said.

And so far, analysts seem to agree.

"Capital is no longer a key issue for this company," Robert Sedran, an analyst at CIBC World Markets, said in a note Thursday. He said this was partly due to a more stable global macroeconomic outlook, "but more importantly, the ongoing de-risking activities that the company continues to pursue," he said.

Maulife still needs interest rates and equity market movement in its favour, but analysts have boosted their price targets. After a profitable fourth quarter, with earnings of $1.1-billion and reassuring growth in Asia, there's a lot more optimism around the insurer.

(Jacqueline Nelson is a Globe and Mail Financial Services Reporter.)

Return to Streetwise home page.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter