Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

This May 23, 2013 photo, shows El Corral, a village of 200 inhabitants in northern Chile, located just downstream from the world’s highest gold mine site, Barrick Gold Corp's Pascua-Lama project.

Jorge Saenz/The Associated Press

Barrick Gold Corp. was hit with another potential class-action lawsuit from investors, alleging that the Canadian miner misrepresented troubles with its Pascua Lama gold project in the Andes.

The suit, which has yet to be certified as a class action, was filed in the Ontario Superior Court and seeks $6-billion in damages, including for losses related to the drop in Barrick's shares.

The lawsuit alleges that the Toronto-based company omitted information and misled investors about the progress and feasibility of Pascua Lama.

Story continues below advertisement

The mountaintop project, which sits on the border of Argentina and Chile, was initially expected to cost $3-billion to build. But costs eventually jumped to more than $8.5-billion.

Barrick has since halted construction and recorded about $6-billion in writedowns related to Pascua Lama.

The lawsuit cites press releases and statements made from various Barrick officials from 2009 through 2013.

None of the allegations have been proven in a court.

Barrick said: "The company is aware that a notice of action has been filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Barrick disputes the allegations, and will defend itself against any lawsuit vigorously."

The suit was filed by Koskie Minsky LLP, a well-known class-action law firm in Canada.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies