Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Kevin O'Leary is best known as an outspoken entrepreneur on CBC's Dragon's Den.

Della Rollins For The Globe and Mail/della rollins The Globe and Mail

Kevin O'Leary can't stop thinking about redemptions.

Not only is his latest CBC show titled Redemption Inc., a series that gives 10 ex-convicts a chance to set up their own business with his money, he's also been pre-occupied with redemptions of a different sort: withdrawals from his O'Leary funds.

Last week it was reported that annual redemptions from these funds hit $500-million. Mr. O'Leary is now disputing this total, citing a redemption value of $253-million instead.

Story continues below advertisement

The $500-million total was initially calculated by Mark McQueen at Wellington Financial. The Globe and Mail, using O'Leary Funds' annual report, came up with the same figure, but Mr. O'Leary explained these public documents are misleading.

Five of his funds, typically those with the phrase "Yield Advantaged" in their name, employ a nifty swap strategy that lowers the tax burden for investors. To do this, each is actually made up of two separate funds, meaning there are 10 funds in total. The two funds in each strategy are referred to as "top" and "bottom" funds in industry lingo, and although both have financial statements, Mr. O'Leary explained that only the redemptions from the top fund matter.

For that reason, the $99.9-million that appears to have been redeemed from the Convertible Portfolio Trust, the highest total for any fund, doesn't qualify because it is a bottom fund.

Seem confusing? That's because it is. A number of industry experts have looked through the O'Leary funds' public documents since the first redemption value was reported, and they all informed the Globe that even they can't wrap their heads around the redemptions and total assets under management. Mr. O'Leary has posted a document on the fund company's website to try to make things a bit more clear.

However, the insiders all acknowledged industry speculation that the O'Leary funds are having problems. Of the 46 different mutual and closed-end funds listed on the company's website -- a number that includes multiple series of the same funds -- only 15 of the 46 have net asset values above their $10.00 starting point. Keep in mind that these funds pay distributions, so their total return is likely higher. The Canadian Income Opportunities Fund 2, for instance, has a net asset value of $10.0254, but after adding in distributions its NAV jumps to $11.3261. But on the other hand, the funds charge management fees that eat into these returns.

Still, the general consensus is that redemptions of $253-million is still a big number for a firm with total assets under management of around $1.1-billion.

Mr. O'Leary doesn't think so. "We've had our lumps just like anybody else," he said in an interview, noting that many mutual funds have experienced outflows as investors pile into income and balanced funds. However, he failed to acknowledge that his funds, which are dividend-and-yield heavy, are precisely the kinds of funds that investors have been flocking to.

Story continues below advertisement

He also took offence to speculation that O'Leary Funds has been trying to find a buyer for a number of months -- another industry rumour. "Absolutely not. We are not trying to find a buyer," Mr. O'Leary said, later adding for emphasis: "No thank you, not selling. Period."

However, he did not deny that a number of employees have left the firm in the past few months.

Mr. O'Leary chalks this up to high turnover in any startup, rather than anything to do with the performance of his funds.

"I've been involved in many entrepreneurial startups, and that's really what O'Leary funds is," he said. "Generally after six or seven years, you only find a third of the original founders originally there. That's the nature of growing a business."

Editor's note: This article has been updated to clarify that the $500-million redemption figure is not correct.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies