Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Manulife to pay $11.7-million in OSC settlement over overcharging investors

The Manulife Financial headquarters in Toronto, August 29, 2012.

Galit Rodan/The Globe and Mail

Manulife Securities has agreed to repay clients $11.7-million for overpayment of fees as part of a settlement that was approved Thursday by the Ontario Securities Commission.

This was the latest in a long list of similar so-called "no-contest" agreements between the regulator and investment dealers in Canada over fees.

Earlier in the week, the OSC alleged that Manulife overcharged some mutual fund clients and certain investors in fee-based accounts over a period that stretched back more than a decade. Manulife's oversight and supervision was inadequate, according to the OSC.

Story continues below advertisement

Manulife has also agreed to pay $495,000 in recognition of the OSC's mandate to protect investors and contribute $25,000 in costs for the regulator's investigation.

As part of the agreement, Manulife neither admitted nor denied the allegations.

"Regular vigilance is required to safeguard client accounts from errors and inattention," Jeff Kehoe, director of enforcement at the OSC, said in a release.

"Clients have the right to expect robust compliance systems and controls to protect against excess fees."

This was the 9th no-contest settlement between the OSC and Canadian financial insitutions. To date, $354-million has been returned to investors.

Last month, Royal Bank of Canada agreed to pay $21.8-million to compensate clients for overcharging fees.

With a file from Christina Pellegrini

Story continues below advertisement

Andrew Willis of Report on Business tells investors why they should be wary of buying into private pot businesses going public The Globe and Mail
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.