Skip to main content

When TransCanada Corp. decided to pull the plug on the Energy East pipeline this week, it set off a noisy and worrisome east-versus-west political spat.

The scarier response was the total silence over the death of the $15.7-billion project from CEOs at Canada's largest utilities.

No one in the energy industry is speaking out this week, but know that what Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre celebrated as a "victory" for opponents of Energy East and Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall decried as "a very bad day for the west" was seen by Canadian executives as yet another reason to look south at U.S. expansion, rather than get their heads kicked in pushing plans to build infrastructure in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

The failure of Energy East is latest in a series of domestic setbacks for Canadian utilities, and this isn't just about troubled pipeline proposals. In contrast, when the same companies push U.S. projects, all they do is win.

The north/south dynamic was summed up in a CIBC World Markets report published three days before the Energy East decision. The investment bank pointed out that Canadian regulators are turning the screws on the returns that utilities are allowed to earn, while U.S. counterparts are happy to sign off on new projects with healthy profit margins. CIBC analysts said: "The divergent environments for regulated utilities between Canada and the U.S. affirm our view that U.S. franchises can be relatively attractive acquisitions targets for Canadian companies."

Specifically, CIBC pointed out that Ontario regulators recently hammered Hydro One Ltd., the province's largest electrical utility, by eliminating tax breaks and slashing capital spending requests. The investment bank said the decision "highlights the ongoing challenges Canadian utility companies face domestically."

At the same time, Florida regulators signed off on Emera Inc.'s plan to spend $1.1-billion on six solar energy projects that are expected to earn the Halifax-based utility a return of between 9.25 per cent and 11.25 per cent. Florida enticed a private sector investor into paying for the state's move from coal to renewable energy, while Emera got assets that generate dependable cash flow.

Canadian governments of all stripes talk about the crying need for infrastructure renewal, to ensure the country's economic competitiveness. Domestic utilities are the natural source of capital for many of these projects.

Yet, Canada's largest utilities are choosing to invest outside the country, dropping more than $100-billion over the past two years on major U.S. acquisitions. Hydro One, for example, is in the midst of a $4.4-billion takeover of an electrical and natural gas company based in Spokane, Wash., while TransCanada spent $10.2-billion (U.S.) in 2016 to buy natural gas pipelines that stretch from New York to the Gulf of Mexico, and Emera dropped $6.5-billion in 2015 on an electric utility that keeps the lights on in Florida and New Mexico.

The public debate over pipeline projects will continue to rage, with Kinder Morgan Inc.'s planned Trans Mountain expansion in British Columbia looming as the next battleground. So too will the long-simmering political disputes over the rights and needs of eastern and western provinces within Canadian federation. But leaders of Canada's largest utilities are signalling they've made up their minds on where they want to operate, and effectively voted with their wallets. Across the board, domestic utilities are committing massive amounts of capital to build infrastructure in the United States, due to a perceived lack of opportunity in their home markets.

Story continues below advertisement

While no CEO is willing to say so in public, what's playing out around the Energy East and Trans Mountain projects will serve to justify that view.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter