Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Regional disparity in Canada among worst in OECD

These are stories Report on Business is following Tuesday, Oct. 7, 2014.

Follow Michael Babad and The Globe's Business Briefing on Twitter.

Regional disparity in Canada among widest
Regional disparity in Canada is among the widest in the developed world, a new report says.

Story continues below advertisement

Based on per-capita gross domestic product, Canada was home to the "third-largest regional disparities" across the countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2010, the OECD study shows.

The OECD notes in its regional outlook, for example, that the difference between Alberta's low jobless rate and the high unemployment in Nunavut was a full 10.4 percentage points in 2012.

And looking at younger people, the OECD found that the youth unemployment rate across Canada was below the OECD average, but "remained high" in Newfoundland and Labrador.

The United States topped the list for regional disparity in the study.

"Inter-regional income disparities have widened in most OECD countries over recent decades; the crisis did little to change this trend," the report says.

"Where disparities have narrowed this has generally reflected weak performance in wealthier regions, rather than growth in poorer ones," it adds.

"The crisis has also accentuated disparities in unemployment across regions."

Story continues below advertisement

The report also notes how debt has climbed at levels below that of a national government, and Canada tops this list.

"Sub-national government debt per capita thus ranges from [$340 U.S.] in Greece to [$18,250 U.S.] for Canadian provinces," it says.

Lobbying effort near payoff
A sustained Canadian lobbying effort to prevent Alberta oil sands output labeled as dirty oil in Europe is on the verge of paying off.

A new European Commission proposal officially released today would ensure that no transportation fuel supplied to the 28-country European Union, from diesel to compressed natural gas, would be penalized based on the carbon intensity of the base fuel, such as that from the oil sands, used to make the fuel that goes into cars and trucks, our European correspondent Eric Reguly reports.

"It is no secret that our initial proposal could not go through due to resistance faced in some member states," EC climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard said in a statement. "However, the commission is today giving this another push, to try and ensure that in the future, there will be a methodology and thus an incentive to choose less polluting fuels over more polluting ones like, for example, oil sands."

The proposal should open the door to more oil exports from Canada to Europe, though the potential market for Canadian oil would be limited by the European refineries ability, or lack thereof, to upgrade the heavy oil into light transportation fuels such as gasoline.

Story continues below advertisement

IMF cuts forecast
The International Monetary Fund cut its outlook for global economic growth, an acknowledgement that there are limits to the United States' ability to power the world economy on its own.

Gross domestic product in the U.S. will expand 2.2 per cent in 2014, the IMF said in a revised outlook today, a remarkable achievement given U.S. GDP contracted in the first quarter, our Washington correspondent Kevin Carmichael reports.

But the global economy no longer is a single-engine plane and the other motors are troubled. Economic growth in China remains strong, but it's slowing, and the IMF is worried the real estate market could crash. The bigger problems are in Europe and Japan, where demand is so weak that deflation remains a serious threat in both places.

Canada is among a group of advanced economies along with Britain, Norway and some others that the IMF characterized as "solid." The IMF raised its outlook for Canada's GDP growth this year to 2.3 per cent and in 2015 to 2.4 per cent, from 2.2 per cent and 2.3 per cent, respectively.

Rio says no
Speculation is rife today over the potential for the mother of all mergers, despite the fact that the target said no.

Rio Tinto PLC today outlined how Glencore Xstrata PLC approached the mining giant "regarding a potential merger" of the two in July.

"The Rio Tinto board, after consultation with its financial and legal advisers, concluded unanimously that a combination was not in the best interests of Rio Tinto's shareholders," it added.

"The board's rejection was communicated to Glencore in early August and there has been no further contact between the companies on this matter."

As these things go, of course, that doesn't necessarily mean all that much.

"Glencore courted Xstrata on and off for years before the merger was completed, which goes to show how persistent Glencore can be," market analyst David Madden of IG in London said today as Rio Tinto shares climbed.

"Rio Tinto knocked back a takeover offer worth £90-billion from BHP Billiton in 2008; it is now worth £58-billion and I doubt Rio Tinto will want to make the same mistake twice," he added.

"The broader mining sector is also reaping the rewards from the M&A story as takeover talks are never put to bed easily."

Building permits sink
Canada's construction industry pulled back in August, though that followed three strong months.

The value of building permits issued by cities across the country plunged 27.3 per cent in August, Statistics Canada said today, largely on weaker showings for non-residential construction in Quebec and residential building in Ontario.

"That significant retreat brought the year-on-year gain to a modest 2.4 per cent, with August's loss driven by a greater than 40-per-cent drop in non-residential permits - a fact that will hurt some of the hopes reserved for a sustainable turn higher in business investment," said Nick Exarhos of CIBC World Markets.

Remember that the August showing followed three months of double-digit gains.

And this is one indicator that is particularly volatile.

How to bug people
The folks behind a new mobile app have a report today on how to annoy your co-workers via e-mail.

The survey by MailTime, of course, is aimed at not annoying your co-workers. But if you want to get a rise out of someone, here are the top five mistakes:

  • E-mails that are “insensitive” in their tone, which 93 per cent of people don’t like.
  • E-mails that aren’t personally addressed, 88 per cent.
  • E-mails that have many replies, 87 per cent.
  • E-mails with “numerous recipients,” 82 per cent.
  • E-mails that run on, 81 per cent.

By the way, almost 20 per cent of people won't "fully read" an e-mail that's longer than a paragraph, and it goes up from there: 51 per cent won't read it if it's longer than two paragraphs, 76 per cent if it's longer than three, and 84 per cent if it's longer than four.

Streetwise (for subscribers)

Real estate

ROB Insight (for subscribers)

Business ticker

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Report on Business News Editor

Michael Babad is a Report on Business editor and co-author of three business books. He has been with Report on Business for several years, and has also been a reporter and editor at The Toronto Star, The Financial Post and United Press International. His articles have appeared in major newspapers around the world. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨