Skip to main content

Top CEOs will earn more by today than average Canadian does in 2017: report

A report from Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives says this year’s elite group of chief executive officers will earn the average, full-time Canadian wage by 11:47 a.m. on Jan. 3.

dagmar heymans/iStockphoto

Before noon today, Canada's highest-paid CEOs will earn more than the average working person's income for all of 2017.

That's the conclusion of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, an Ottawa-based think-tank that has tracked CEO compensation in this country for a decade.

It says this year's elite group of chief executive officers will earn the average, full-time Canadian wage by 11:47 a.m. on Jan. 3 – the second working day of 2017.

Story continues below advertisement

Last year, it would have taken about half an hour longer – until 12:18 p.m. on the second working day of 2016.

Hugh Mackenzie, a Toronto-based independent economist who wrote the Policy Alternatives report, says the clock analogy is a powerful way to illustrate a widening gap between what top executives get paid and what average Canadian workers earn.

"There's clearly been an explosion in the compensation of senior executives in Canada and the United States. And that serves as a very potent symbol, I think, of the growth of income inequality," Mackenzie said in an interview.

This year's report, based on information released by Canadian publicly traded companies in 2016, estimates the average compensation of the Top 100 chief executives was $9.5-million in 2015 – 193 times the average annual industrial wage.

That's up from $8.96-million in 2014 – 184 times the average annual industrial wage that year.

Mackenzie says the problem lies with the way CEOs earn this money – often with stock grants and stock options that can lead executives to make decisions that reward them in the short term rather than the company or public at large.

He suggests Ottawa should level the playing field by ending a tax break for proceeds from stock options "The proceeds of stock options in Canada are taxed at half the rate of ordinary income," Mackenzie says.

Story continues below advertisement

"The (Trudeau) government actually promised to get rid of that but then backed down in the face of opposition from the business community."

"One of the things that I'm going to be watching with some interest is what the government does in its next budget with respect to that campaign commitment."

Mackenzie says the trend to higher CEO compensation has been pretty consistent over the years – regardless of the broader economic downturns or shareholder attempts to get more say on executive pay.

But he admits there always seems to be at least one or two individual CEOs each year who are far ahead of the others, possibly distorting the overall averages in the Top 100.

Most of the year-over-year increase in the Policy Options report was due to just one person – Michael Pearson, formerly CEO of Valeant Pharmaceuticals – who vaulted to No. 1 with $182.9-million of compensation in 2015 from No. 15 at just under $11.35-million in 2014.

Pearson's rise was due mostly to $179.4-million of share compensation in 2015 – a year when Laval, Que.-based Valeant was at times Canada's most valuable company with a stock above $300 per share for a two-month stretch in the summer.

Story continues below advertisement

Since then, Valeant has lost more than 90 per cent of its market value following a series of problems – including U.S. investigations into price hikes for some of its drugs – that emerged before Pearson departed in early 2016.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.