Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Billie the dog walks along with about 2,000 people march through the streets in support of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers, who rallied outside Prime Minister Stephen Harper's office below Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Sunday January 26, 2014.

FRED CHARTRAND/The Canadian Press

Canada Post's unions want the Crown corporation replaced as administrator of its badly underfunded pension plan, citing potential conflicts of interest and a refusal to fix the plan's problems.

In a letter to the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, the unions complain that Canada Post failed to meet its obligations to workers when it stopped making mandatory payments into the plan without warning.

"Canada Post cannot simply act in its own narrow corporate interest," the Canadian Union of Postal Workers and the Public Service Alliance of Canada pointed out in the letter to OSFI Superintendent Julie Dickson, which was obtained by The Globe and Mail.

Story continues below advertisement

In December, Ottawa granted the post office a four-year reprieve on making special payments into the plan, which had a $6.5-billion solvency deficit at the end of 2012. Canada Post was due to start putting $1-billion of cash per year into the plan in 2014, but claimed in December that it couldn't afford to.

The granting of pension relief coincided with Canada Post's unveiling of a controversial plan to return to profitability, which includes a hefty stamp price hike and the elimination of home delivery to millions of Canadians.

"It appears to us that the pension relief was linked to the corporation's announcements," explained George Kuehnbaum, CUPW's national secretary-treasurer and a member of the Canada Post pension advisory council.

The problem for Canada Post is that it is now losing money, largely because of dwindling mail volumes. The company estimates that its restructuring plan will boost its bottom line by an estimated $700-million to $900-million a year, or less than what it needs to meet its pension obligations.

Securing pension relief might be in Canada Post's "corporate interest," but isn't necessarily in "the interest of all beneficiaries," including roughly 60,000 employees and up to 70,000 retirees, the union letter points out.

Canada Post spokeswoman Anick Losier said the company takes its pension responsibilities very seriously. "We remain committed to administering the plan collaboratively with our bargaining units and with the best interest of all plan members," she said.

If Canada Post was in the private sector it would be forced to seek court protection from creditors if it couldn't keep up payments into the plan, according to the CUPW and PSAC letter, sent Jan. 29.

Story continues below advertisement

But because Canada Post is a Crown corporation, Ottawa is on the hook for all of its financial obligations, making bankruptcy unlikely. As a result, the postal service can't make the case that its "pension funding situation was so urgent that it could not give notice to or meaningfully engage with plan beneficiaries before it sought regulatory relief from its sole shareholder, the government of Canada," according to the letter.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies