Skip to main content

A new TD Economics report says women in the science, technology engineering and math (STEM) fields disproportionately wind up in lower-paying technical roles than higher paid professional ones.

TommL/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Women in the science, technology engineering and math (STEM) fields disproportionately wind up in lower-paying technical roles than higher paid professional ones, according to a new report by TD Economics.

Roles in the STEM fields are in high demand and pay higher incomes than many other professions. That means it will be difficult to close the overall gender wage gap if women don't make stronger inroads in these industries, according to the report.

There are four men for every one woman graduating with a bachelor's degree in engineering, the report notes. That figure has hardly changed in more than a decade.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, in math and computer sciences, there are three men for every woman graduate - a ratio that the study says has actually worsened from two decades ago.

STEM jobs can be divided into two broad categories: technical roles and professional roles. Progressing from a technical role to a professional one often requires additional education such as a university degree, according to the report.

Women in professional STEM roles earn 30 to 37 per cent more than those in technical roles. However, the study notes that women with university degrees are overrepresented in technical roles, at about one third. (That compares to 21 per cent for men.)

"It's not sufficient for a company to take an active role in implementing initiatives to provide greater job opportunities to women within STEM fields," the report says.

"Employers need to look inward to review whether hiring biases are occurring by asking and measuring the most basic of questions: Are employees right-skilled to their education and skill levels? Are development and professional opportunities provided equally to individuals?"

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.