Skip to main content

Alphonso Davies is off to Bayern Munich. Here’s why he’s Canada’s most important soccer player

The previous time the greatest-ever Canadian soccer player left for Europe, no one noticed.

Calgary’s Owen Hargreaves was 16 years old when scouts from German giant Bayern Munich hoovered him up into their youth system. They were well ahead of Canada in that regard.

Few media outlets noted the move, and none did any more than brief it. It was 1997 and putting the words “soccer” and “Canada” into the same sentence qualified as a narcotic-level sleep aid.

Story continues below advertisement

Once he was a big deal, Canada’s national teams wanted in on the Hargreaves business. Nursing a series of grievances against various levels of the Canadian setup, Hargreaves and his family began a years-long campaign of avoidance.

First, the teenager agreed to play internationally for Wales (through his mother). Eventually, he switched to England (through his father).

In the end, Hargreaves’s career flared like a struck match. For just a moment – during the 2006 World Cup and its immediate aftermath – he was regarded as one of the better players in the world. But injuries undid him early.

Hargreaves never did play for the country he was raised in and was never given any reason to regret it. If he was our great missed opportunity, we were hardly his.

Twenty years later, the country gets its chance to redo the Hargreaves mess with Alphonso Davies.

On Wednesday, Davies finalized a move to Hargreaves’s alma mater in Munich. A Liberian by way of Ghana and Edmonton, the 17-year-old entered the Vancouver Whitecaps youth system three years ago. He is a raw and remarkable talent.

Canada's Alphonso Davies, left, and Jamaica's Kemar Lawrence fight for the ball during their CONCACAF tournament match in Glendale, Ariz., on July 20, 2017.

ROBYN BECK/Getty Images

Bayern is reportedly putting up something in the range of $29-million to acquire his services, a Major League Soccer record.

Story continues below advertisement

As the global soccer economy explodes, the biggest franchises have become more focused on acquiring younger players, on the reasonable theory that it’s the last time you can save a few bucks.

However, spending this much on an untested high schooler is still rare enough to be notable.

So, Davies isn’t just a big deal in this corner of the world. He’s a big deal, full stop. He’s not yet the best Canadian player ever, but is looking likely to get there sooner rather than later.

Most importantly, he’s already ours. Canada Soccer was so anxious to get a national-team jersey on Davies that the president showed up with one at his citizenship ceremony. He was chosen for the team the next day.

At the time, Davies was already being described by officials as the “cornerstone” of Canada’s 2026 World Cup team.

He was 16.

Story continues below advertisement

The key problem of Canadian men’s soccer – that we are inexplicably bad at it – has occupied many big sports brains for a long time. The approach has never changed. It might best be described as the “amateur home computer fix.”

You pull out the plug and restart the thing every few years and hope it boots up.

And it never boots up.

Like his predecessors, new senior men’s coach John Herdman has begun with a vision that emphasizes bureaucracy. We need to harmonize systems, improve coaching and create a hive-mind of purpose at the grassroots.

That all sounds great, but it doesn’t change the fact that the next Hargreaves or Davies will not be developed in Mississauga. In order to succeed, Canada’s soccer infrastructure must be outsourced to places where they do this professionally.

If Davies becomes what Canada hopes, this country will have had little to do with it. We’ve sub-contracted the most important work to Germany.

Leagues around the world have already developed the harmonized systems, improved coaching and hive-minds of purpose that Canada is now determined to build from scratch (again). They’re called professional clubs, and they do the work for free.

If Canada wants to matter at soccer, the goal should not be getting hold of young players and developing them – the hockey approach. It should be inviting foreign clubs to come for a visit and leave with a well-paid human souvenir. Clubs have never before been as anxious to travel.

The trick is binding those young players to the Canadian national program at the same time.

Many of the best of them are newcomers, like Davies; or have ties to the old country, like Hargreaves; or have lived long enough in a new country that they can choose to represent it, like Dutch-by-way-of-Scarborough Jonathan de Guzman.

That gives them choices. Canada often seems to be last on the list. Why is that? It should be the first question Canada Soccer asks itself. It should occupy the majority of its working hours.

If we’re being cynical about it, Davies would have been better off choosing to play for Ghana. That was the smart move.

But he was not cynical about it. Davies called being chosen to play for Canada “one of my dreams,” which is probably a bit of an exaggeration, but nice nonetheless. He is the most important soccer player to choose this country. It’s an enormously lucky break. For us, not him.

Now what Canada needs is the next Davies. He’s out there somewhere.

Herdman’s main task isn’t coaching a soccer team. It’s finding the next Davies and sending him abroad, but first making sure he’s willing to come home when it counts.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter