Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Rogers wants to tear down the home of the Toronto Blue Jays, the Rogers Centre, and replace it with a multi-use real-estate development anchored by a new ballpark.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

For me, it was the moment a half-naked fan (the wrong half) decided it was a good idea to try ripping a urinal off the wall in an upper-tier bathroom, flooding a section of the Rogers Centre and shutting down an elevator bank during the runup to the 2015 Blue Jays’ playoff run.

As we trudged up a decrepit concrete stairwell buried inside the outdated concrete pillbox the Rogers Centre had become, you knew it was time for a change.

Five years on, those very profitable winds have begun to blow. As first reported Friday by The Globe and Mail’s Andrew Willis, team owner Rogers and developers Brookfield are proposing to tear down the old thing.

Story continues below advertisement

It will be replaced by the most fantabulous trick in any sports conglomerate’s act – building a multipurpose real estate development (including new stadium) where once only a stadium existed.

Keep your eyes on the city council chamber, ladies and gentlemen, and watch them turn this worthless pile of prefab junk with a leaking roof and no drainage into billions of dollars. Ta daaaa.

And they don’t even own the land. It’s … it’s … magic!

There will be plenty of time – and I mean endless amounts of time – to argue whether the rich should get richer here. (Hint: They will.)

But in the interim, we can at least agree that the Rogers Centre must be destroyed. In this, it is like the Death Star, except not cool. It’s like the Death Star if Darth Vader got assigned there and said, “Nope. Not signing there. That artificial turf will kill my lightsabre game.”

Still, I presume the place has some admirers. Maybe you got married there, or got hit in the head with a foul ball and still have the bump. It’s okay to feel a nostalgic pull toward the Rogers Centre. It does profoundly call into question your sense of aesthetics – please, please, do not decorate anything – but it’s okay.

For the sake of those people, let’s do a Rogers Centre ‘for’ and ‘against’ list.

Story continues below advertisement

For: It has a moving roof.

Against: The roof no longer works properly. Plus, it has holes. The place is ugly as sin. When the roof is closed, it’s more humid than the Amazon in there. When it’s open, half those in attendance cook like eggs on hot asphalt. The team is functionally playing on concrete, which is hard on the knees. It’s too big, so it’s usually half-empty. Bad amenities. Zero atmosphere. Players hate it, especially free-agent players. Other than that, it’s great.

Sure, it had a moment. But we’re being literal here. It was just a moment.

When it opened in ’89, it was state of the art. Three years later, Baltimore debuted Oriole Park at Camden Yards and the SkyDome was already a dinosaur.

When people go to a game, they want that experience – homey, comforting, wide-open spaces and the murmur of the crowd. Something more green than grey. A lot of sky. Three-and-a-half hours of baseball can be – let’s face it – boring. So it should at least be pretty.

You sit in the stands in Baltimore (or any of the other throwback stadiums that copied it in Cleveland, Washington, San Francisco, etc., etc.) and you can see and feel those cities laid out around you. Those buildings are smaller than the Dome, and simultaneously much bigger.

Story continues below advertisement

In order to get the weather-proofing right, they built the SkyDome like a medium-security prison. No open-topped park in baseball feels so claustrophobic. Noise-wise, it sounds as if you are at the bottom of a well. If ballparks are meant to summon up imagery from The Natural or Field of Dreams, this one brings to mind Escape From Alcatraz.

Years back, I recall standing with a bunch of other baseball writers deep underneath Yankee Stadium – the old one – waiting for an elevator. That park was also decrepit, but the walls bled history and it was not closed to the city. You could peek out over the wall in left and see Manhattan in the distance.

That night, they’d just postponed a game because of rain. We were all chomping to begin our unscheduled evening off. As we waited, Yankees general manager Brian Cashman sidled up alongside us.

“You guys from Toronto?”


“Sure wish we had one of those roofs,” Cashman said, grinning. “But we just can’t afford it.”

Story continues below advertisement

I don’t think he meant it as an insult, but that’s how we took it. Yankee Stadium had Monument Park, the short porch in right and Babe Ruth had played there. We had a piece of crap with a tarp you could pull over the top of it.

It didn’t hurt. I mean, I didn’t design the place. But it stirred in me something sportswriters try to avoid – hometown pride.

Whether or not you are a fan of the game, baseball stadiums matter to a big city. They matter far more than hockey or basketball arenas, all of which look the same from the outside (and, increasingly, the inside).

A great ballpark is magnificent from any angle. If the location is right, you can see it from many blocks away and from the air. They are the modern, secular equivalent of cathedrals. Because while I presume most residents of Barcelona don’t attend mass at La Sagrada Familia, I also presume the same people feel a measure of pride when they look at it.

A ballpark can be the defining architectural feature of a place. As such, we all ought to care at least a little that it is done right (which is not to suggest that we should all pay for it).

The SkyDome/Rogers Centre was a bold venture and, as it turned out, a failed one. Aesthetically, it is indefensible. Toronto would be better off if it had dug a big hole in the ground and called it the Less Grand Canyon.

Story continues below advertisement

So it is impossible to do the knee-jerk thing – argue that what was should always stay that way.

If the city, its residents and its planners are going to invest their energy into arguing about this project, let them ensure this is being done less like a Trump and more like a Borgia.

Our collective goal should be ensuring that producing something beautiful is the first, second and third priority of any new stadium, and that profit figures somewhere further down the line.

In Photos: Rogers Centre through the years

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies