Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Seattle Seahawks defensive end Darrell Taylor holds back Indianapolis Colts quarterback Carson Wentz, who fumbled in the first half in Indianapolis on Sept. 12, 2021.

The Associated Press

So it’s the day after an NFL game. Or the day before. Or the morning of.

And there are the coaches, reminding players about how damaging giveaways can be and how rewarding takeaways are. Call it the Turnover Topic.

Heading into Week 2 of the schedule, fumbles and interceptions already have played a major role in wins and losses. Just ask Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, Dalvin Cook, Ryan Tannehill, Damien Harris and Trevor Lawrence about their mistakes.

Story continues below advertisement

“That ticked me off. I hate fumbles,” Jackson said after his bobble in overtime helped Las Vegas to victory. “I hate any type of turnover.”

Don’t bother bringing it up to the likes of John Harbaugh and other pro coaches. They never stop harping on it.

“We just didn’t close the game out when we had the opportunity to do it, three or four times,” Ravens coach Harbaugh said. “You know, that is what you need to do. When you have an opportunity to win, you got to go win it, and we just didn’t do it tonight.”

Nor did the Browns, despite outplaying the Chiefs in Kansas City for much of the opener. Mayfield’s pick was the final clinching blow.

“It’s critical situations,” Mayfield said. “Those are the moments where you look back and everybody’s going to remember that last play and that can be the difference. No matter what has happened previously, you can throw all of that out the window as long as you have a chance and whoever has the ball last, if you can make a play those are the ones that matter.”

When turnovers become more than annoying is if they are chronic. Mayfield, despite his advancements, leads the league with 16 fourth-quarter interceptions since 2018.

When Ronald Jones fumbled in the kickoff game last week for Tampa Bay against Dallas, he pretty much disappeared for the rest of the night. The explanation later on from coach Bruce Arians was stark, an inside look at how damaging turnovers can be to a player’s psyche.

Story continues below advertisement

Pat Kirwan, who has scouted, coached and been an NFL team executive, noticed.

“We don’t hear that kind of comment from many coaches,” said Kirwan, a SiriusXM NFL Radio host and analyst. “How many coaches have we ever heard say, ‘Yeah, he didn’t play much after that because he couldn’t handle it mentally.’ That to me is an indictment of a guy and I think it is a warning sign to the player from the coach: ‘We are not going to have much more than that.’

“You start in the tank business on the sideline. ... It is easy to say forget the play and go on to the next player, but if you can’t do that emotionally, you won’t be there for long. That was so strong a statement about a professional football. It happens, a lot more than people think, but you never hear it. If coaches start to detect that problem they start to lose trust in the player that I can count on you on game day.”

Most of the players who were in giving mode in Week 1 won’t be benched. They’ll be bugged and berated about protecting the ball. If they don’t learn, well, then there’s a problem that can curtail careers.

On the other side, eager defenders look to rip out the football from the ball carrier. Or jump a route for an interception. There are drills in practice that can be dedicated to exactly that. Nothing makes a defensive player’s day more than a strip-sack or a pick or a fumble recovery.

But there’s a danger to harping on the negative, according to Browns special teams co-ordinator Mike Priefer. He saw punter Jamie Gillan drop a snap, then panic late in the loss at Kansas City.

Story continues below advertisement

“I don’t like to practise failure,” Priefer said. “I’m being serious, like a fire call on a field goal. We muff a field goal snap, we talk about it, we might walk through it, but we never want to actually practice that exact situation because to me if you’re practising a dropped snap, you’re practising failure.

“Do we talk about those things? Of course, and we cover the different situations.”

Of course, unusual situations always seem to crop up in NFL games. The stats don’t always support the circumstances, either.

Consider all those interceptions that go on a quarterback’s ledger when a well-thrown ball deflects off a receiver; the Raiders were victimized by that in overtime against Baltimore, only to profit moments later on Jackson’s fumble. Also think about bad snaps by centres that go down as giveaways by QBs. Run-pass option plays when it’s not clear who is at fault.

Regardless, the turnover arguably (and not very arguably) is the second-most important occurrence behind a touchdown. For defences, it’s a turn on. For offences, it’s time to turn away in disgust.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies