Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

‘The team worked hard. We deserved a better result,’ Montreal Canadiens coach Michel Therrien, centre, said after a 3-2 loss to the Colorado Avalanche. ‘It’s too bad an individual mistake cost us the game late in the game.’

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

Debate raged Thursday on whether Montreal Canadiens coach Michel Therrien should be axed after he pinned the blame for his team's latest defeat on star defenceman P.K. Subban.

General manager Marc Bergevin's clear statement on Jan. 21 that Therrien will at least finish the season in Montreal has been put to the test as strident calls came for the fourth-year coach to be fired on social media, and in traditional media as well.

The Canadiens cancelled a scheduled afternoon practice, so no players or coaches were available for comment.

Story continues below advertisement

The team that began the season on a 19-4-3 tear has gone into a free fall and the discontent among fans spiked with a 3-2 loss to the Avalanche in Colorado on Wednesday night.

With about three minutes left and the game tied 2-2, Subban tried to go around Colorado's Mikhail Grigorenko, but was poke-checked and fell to the ice. Grigorenko started a three-man rush the other way that led to Jarome Iginla's game-winning goal.

"The team worked hard. We deserved a better result," Therrien said after the game. "It's too bad an individual mistake cost us the game late in the game."

Asked to elaborate, he said: "We believe that, as a coach, he [Subban] could have made a better decision at the blueline. He put himself in a tough position. We play as a team. When we don't we could be in trouble and this is what happened."

Subban said he didn't sense any danger on the play until he "lost an edge" trying to beat Grigorenko.

"It doesn't happen to me too often but it sucks that that's the winning goal," he said. "If I do that play all over again and don't lose an edge, I probably take it down the wall and create something."

It led to a three-against-three situation in the Montreal end in which captain Max Pacioretty was caught covering no one as Matt Duchene fed Grigorenko, who slipped the puck to Iginla for a tap-in from the edge of the crease at 17:59.

Story continues below advertisement

Neither Subban nor Pacioretty was on the ice as the Canadiens pressed for the equalizer in the final minute, but it was the flamboyant defenceman who was singled out. Therrien took heat for not having his best on the ice when there was still time to tie the game and force overtime.

On social media, many blamed Subban for making a selfish play, but just as many defended the team's scoring leader and top offensive weapon, saying the Canadiens need wins for any hope of making the playoffs and it is up to the club's best players to try to make it happen.

Subban, who leads Montreal with 44 points, one more than centre Tomas Plekanec, has been on the ice for 95 of his team's goals this season, fifth-best in the NHL. He has also been the team's hottest player, with 18 points in 21 games since Jan. 1.

The 2013 Norris Trophy winner as the league's best defenceman attracts attention with his stylish clothes and love of the spotlight that is either hailed as refreshing in a traditionally low-key sport or slammed as egomania.

Subban told La Presse he expected to be panned for his mistake, but that he always has the team's success at heart.

Since their hot start ended Dec. 3, the Canadiens, who finished second over all in the NHL last season, have gone 8-32-1 and have dropped into a tie with the Ottawa Senators for fifth place in the Atlantic Division, six points out of a playoff position.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies