Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

There was a funny bit of byplay on the television the other night, when the duelling Sportsnet analysts Nick Kypreos and Darren Pang got talking about oversized goalie equipment, and what the NHL would have to change to put an end to its Michelin Man era.

Pang, who played in the league as a 5-foot-5, 155-pound goaltender (he made the 1988 all-rookie team), donned a modern-day chest protector as a visual aid – and made a convincing point. The padding looked like a suit of armour that completely hid the person it was designed to protect.

Kypreos's counter argument wasn't bad either. The current catching mitts bear only the faintest resemblance to the ones designed a generation ago to stop pucks. You could catch a football or a basketball inside the webbing of today's massive goalie gloves.

Story continues below advertisement

Larger equipment, combined with the increasing size of the modern-day goaltender, has made scoring so impossibly difficult that the NHL has finally admitted a) it has a problem, and b) there are only two possible solutions – shrink the goalie equipment or make the nets bigger.

Greg Millen, now a television analyst, played 604 games over 14 NHL seasons as a 5-foot-9, 175-pound goalie. He believes that while today's netminders have never been better in terms of their talent and fitness levels, some would be exposed if they could no longer rely so heavily on their equipment, which is not designed simply to protect against injury.

"They've got wedges on their pads so their knees never touch the ice," said Millen. "They have flaps on either side of their knees. With the shoulder pads now, they've built them off the shoulder, so they're going farther out. The pants look like garbage bags. Why aren't they form-fitted and rounded against the thighs?

"I'm alarmed for kids coming up," added Millen, "because if you made the nets bigger, then everybody would have to be 6-foot-5 to play goal. How many more kids would that eliminate? You'd be taking their dreams away.

"When the league got rid of all the clutching, holding and grabbing, all of sudden there's room for players like Johnny Gaudreau and Nikolaj Ehlers who are 5-8, 5-9 – extremely exciting to watch and huge contributors to our game," he added. "Looking back, how many great players did we miss out on when scouts weren't interested in players of that size? "Now, we're doing it to the goalies – right before our very eyes – and I don't like it."

To Millen's point, of the 140 goalies who were listed in the NHL's 1989-90 official guide and record book, the vast majority were less than six feet tall – and they were stars of the game.

John Vanbiesbrouck was listed at 5-7, Andy Moog at 5-8, Mike Vernon at 5-9 and Bill Ranford, Glenn Healy, Billy Smith, Grant Fuhr and Curtis Joseph at 5-10. Patrick Roy was a comparative giant at six feet.

Story continues below advertisement

Only eight of the 221 goalies listed in this year's guide and record book are listed at less than six feet. Three of them play in the NHL, two as backups (Anton Khudobin and Jhonas Enroth), one as a starter – the New York Islanders' 5-11 Jaroslav Halak. And even though the Toronto Maple Leafs list Jonathan Bernier at six feet, he might be a shade under as well.

But that's it.

By reducing the size of the equipment, Millen argues, three good things will happen.

First, scoring will increase, because position players will have more net to shoot at.

Second, the entertainment value will go up, because smaller equipment will force goalies to move around, be more athletic and react to shots rather than just rely on body position to block them.

Third, it would give a generation of smaller goalies new hope that they could play hockey professionally; the odds of them making it today are just a shade above zero.

Story continues below advertisement

Of course, all this depends on the NHL's and the players association's commitment to getting it right. There have been multiple attempts in the past to streamline goalie equipment, but with only one man – ex-goalie Kay Whitmore, all of 5-11 of him – tasked with enforcing the rules, it's been a thankless and largely impossible job.

Millen has supporters in the NHL. On Wednesday, Kings' goaltender Jonathan Quick told reporters in Los Angeles that the NHL could fix the goal-scoring drought the easy way, by making the nets bigger, or the right way, by legislating slimmer equipment and then enforcing those limits with more spot checks and more punishing fines.

The NHL went down this path once before with obstruction. Between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s, the NHL endlessly, repeatedly vowed to eliminate obstruction, but then would chicken out as playoff time neared. In 2005-06, coming out of a full year lost to a lockout, their resolve finally stiffened, the rule book was enforced, and soon, obstruction was mostly weaned out of the game.

The same gumption is required here. If it is, and if NHL general managers – who met this past week and made reducing goalie equipment a priority – actually follow through this time, then the game will be better for it.

And maybe the era of the pint-sized goalie making a kick save and a beauty can make a comeback.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies